Storage

Windows Server 8 Virtual Fibre Channel with Hyper-V overview

Deploying virtual fibre channel disks is a frequent practice in virtualization. Rick Vanover highlights some of the many options that exist for Windows Server 8.

One of the highly anticipated features of Windows Server 8 is the ability to provide individual Hyper-V virtual machines with virtual fibre channel HBAs. This feature is new to Hyper-V with the 3rd release of the Microsoft virtualization platform.

A virtual fibre channel port is useful to allow a virtual machine direct access to the storage resource. This can be to ensure zoning is met, such as which worldwide names (WWNs) can access a specific LUNs on a storage resource. Further, this can be e an enabling step for virtualization to ensure this zoning is maintained while also consolidating costly fibre channel port assignments. The virtual fibre channel port leverages the standard N_port ID virtualization (NPIV) process to address virtual machine WWN’s within the Hyper-V host’s physical HBA.

In my vSphere virtualization practice, I’ve come across this as the fibre channel NPIV virtual WWN; which effectively leverages the same NPIV standard. With Hyper-V the decision processes are the same: basically leverage the native virtual disk format (VHD, VMDK, VHDX, etc.) unless specific requirements of a virtual machine exist.

This can lead to a number of efficiencies and options with the virtual machine. Primarily, if the virtual machine’s inventory (VHD, VMDK, VHDX, etc.) contains the entire data profile, features such as snapshots and checkpoints can be leveraged. If virtual fibre channel interfaces are assigned; then that data is not part of the virtual machine in that sense. Back to the earlier point of focusing on the requirements, only provision fibre channel NPIV or virtual fibre channel if the VM needs a LUN directly. Figure A below shows this feature in both Hyper-V and vSphere:

Figure A

Both Hyper-V and vSphere virtual HBAs shown

Both Hyper-V and vSphere virtual HBAs shown

Historically, limitations of the size of a virtual disk file may have been a good reason to provision storage this way. With the expanded capacity of the VHDX file format (16 TB), those reasons may soon be evaporating.

Do you see a use case for virtual fibre channel with Hyper-V and Windows Server 8? Share your comments below.

About

Rick Vanover is a software strategy specialist for Veeam Software, based in Columbus, Ohio. Rick has years of IT experience and focuses on virtualization, Windows-based server administration, and system hardware.

2 comments
JMHP
JMHP

We hope to use access LUNs directly from several virtual SQL Clusters using NPIV. The OS Partitions will be simply VHDxs.

skparekh01
skparekh01

This is the useful feature for the people who has a requirement of different storage then the one used for vmdk and who are using only local disk to host vmdk.

Editor's Picks