President Truman once admonished the U.S. House and Senate as a
"do-nothing Congress" bent on stalling rather than taking action. While
I'm a fan of Harry, I almost wish the do-nothing Congress would make a
comeback, because the legislative branch's obsession with legislating
away the evils of computers and the Internet is causing more problems
than it solves.
CNET's Declan McCullagh warns us that no less
Congress, all modelled on the rousing "success" that was the Can Spam
at the state level, the Terminator himself has signed a California law
banning "heinous, cruel, or depraved" video games, as if such terms
were objectively measurable.
article cuts to the heart of the matter:
"George Mason University
professors Bruce Kobayashi and Larry Ribstein have written about how
Internet federalism affects Americans' privacy rights. They say that
'federal law would perversely lock in a single regulatory framework
while Internet technology is still rapidly evolving. State law, by
contrast, emerges from 51 laboratories and therefore presents a more
decentralized model that fits the evolving nature of the Internet.
Moreover, competition among state laws can mute the inefficient
tendencies of (special interest group) legislation.'"
not the same as progress. State and federal legislators need to take a
breath and figure out where the law can do the most good, rather than
where legislation can score the easiest political points.
Agree, disagree, or got a different take? Throw it into this discussion.
Jay Garmon has a vast and terrifying knowledge of all things obscure, obtuse, and irrelevant. One day, he hopes to write science fiction, but for now he'll settle for something stranger -- amusing and abusing IT pros. Read his full profile. You can also follow him on his personal blog.