CIT unraveling could be headache for Dell, Avaya, resellers

The U.S. government will not bail out debt-ridden CIT, a financial services firm that loans money to small and midsized business. Larry Dignan explains why resellers, Dell, and Avaya are likely to feel at least a few ripples form CIT's possible demise.

This is a guest post from Larry Dignan of TechRepublic’s sister site ZDNet. You can follow Larry on his ZDNet blog Between the Lines, or subscribe to the RSS feed.

The U.S. government has drawn a line in the sand -- it won't bail out debt-ridden CIT, a financial services firm that loans money to small and midsized business in part to buy and lease technology equipment. Unlike other financial company implosions CIT's potential demise could have a direct impact on technology spending.

From CIT's annual report:

We have numerous vendor relationships and operations serving customers around the globe. We have significant vendor programs in information technology, telecommunications equipment, healthcare and other diversified asset types across multiple industries. Through our global relationships with industry-leading equipment vendors, including manufacturers, dealers, and distributors, we deliver customized financing solutions to primarily commercial customers of our vendor partners....

Vendor Finance includes a small and mid-ticket commercial business, which focuses on leasing office equipment, computers and other technology products primarily in the United States and Canada. We originate products through relationships with manufacturers, dealers, distributors and other intermediaries as well as through direct calling.

For the year ending Dec. 31, CIT's vendor finance unit had $12.2 billion in finance and leasing assets.

Now let's put some names on those in the tech sector likely to feel at least a few ripples form CIT's possible demise:

Resellers. CIT has a bevy of relationships with value added resellers and offers leasing arrangements for them. These VARs are also the small and mid-sized businesses that deploy a lot of technology. Dell. Dell on its analyst meeting said it may have to look for alternative funding sources for its financial services unit. Why? CIT is Dell's partner. Dell has $35 million in accounts receivable from CIT, according to Dell CFO Brian Gladden. Avaya. CIT's web site features Avaya as a case study. Here's a snippet:

Working with Avaya Financial Services (AFS), a unit of CIT, Avaya developed innovative financing programs to help enterprises with tight budgets gain the immediate and future benefits of an improved communications network in a tough economy.

Called "Zero Barriers," the program offers zero-interest or low-interest financing to Avaya customers.  Under the promotional program customers could lease the Avaya equipment they needed to improve efficiency, productivity and customer service with a small initial outlay and low monthly fixed payments.  Leasing equipment also conserves capital, reduces the risks of ownership, provides tax benefits in some cases, and offers a wide range of other benefits to lessors.

In fact, Dell and Avaya were listed as CIT's biggest joint ventures in regulatory filings.

Click the image to enlarge.

The first quarter update on the Dell partnership went like this:

Until December 31, 2007, CIT was a partner with Dell Inc. ("Dell") in Dell Financial Services L.P. ("DFS"), a joint venture that offered financing to Dell's customers. The joint venture provided Dell with financing and leasing capabilities that were complementary to its product offerings and provided CIT with a source of new financings. In December 2007, Dell exercised its right to buy CIT's interest and the Company sold its 30% ownership interest in the DFS joint venture. CIT has the right to purchase a minimum percentage of DFS finance receivables on a declining scale through January 2010. CIT has certain recourse to DFS on defaulted contracts. Financing and leasing assets related to the DFS program included in the CIT Consolidated Balance Sheet (but excluding certain related international receivables originated directly by CIT) were approximately $2.1 billion at March 31, 2009 and $2.2 billion at December 31, 2008. Securitized assets included in managed assets were approximately $0.2 billion at both March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

And those are just the largest CIT deals. Dell and Avaya won't have a problem finding new funding partners, but there are a bevy of smaller deals that go bust we'll never hear about. Will a reseller be able to find a financing partner easily in a tight credit market? It's unclear how orderly CIT's potential unraveling will be, but given that the credit crunch was a big reason for the decline of corporate information technology spending it's a distraction the industry doesn't need right now.


I wonder how you got so good. This is really a fascinating blog, lots of stuff that I can get into. One thing I just want to say is that your Blog is so perfect! BUSINESS LOAN

Scotty Bones
Scotty Bones

It's just another case of Obama choosing winners and losers as his agenda sees fit. This isn't a big deal for companies like DELL, who are large enough to find financing elsewhere. By bailing out wallstreet, financial institutions, the auto industry, insurance (AIG) and the attempted take over of health and energy; the government has been able to seize large ownership stakes and exert control over them (these sectors combined make up a large chunk of our economy). The true detriment to society is in the fact that CIT provides loans to the vast majority of SMB's (home-street). By letting CIT fail, The government (Obama) can potentially eliminate a large segment of the economy that he can not directly take control of (if you can't seize it, destroy it). The agenda here is simple, "spread the wealth". The vast majority of the "wealthy" are SMB owners (who usually file under chapter S). By eliminating peoples ability to generate wealth you make everyone poor and completely dependent on government for survival. This will increase unemployment and welfare rolls, which along with unions are the voter base for the Democrat party. However, (in my opinion) the skyrocket in unemployment this is going to cause, will cost the Dem's heavily in the mid-term 2010 elections and ensure that Obama is a one term President. So, there very well may be light at the end of the tunnel after all. Oh well, there's 2.3 billion dollars of TARP down the drain. Note: Obviously I'm not Democrat, but I'm not a Republican either. As far as I'm concerned, at this junction they're just the lesser of two evils.

Sterling chip Camden
Sterling chip Camden

Who, the Republicans, or the Democrats? Let's throw them both out next election.

Scotty Bones
Scotty Bones

yes, the republicans are the lesser of the two evils at this point. But your absolutely right, they both need to go. I'm sick of all their garbage. They both want the same thing, the republicans just want to do it at a slower pace.

Editor's Picks