According to a closed-circuit television (CCTV) expert, up to 95 percent of the CCTV systems operating in the United Kingdom are doing so illegally. Apparently, companies operating CCTV systems in the United Kingdom are required to alert the Information Commissioner of what they are doing and to put up signs warning the public that recording is taking place.
According to The Register, this revelation comes in the wake of new legislation about to take effect in Scotland that could render even more of these systems illegal.
From my own my experience after personally surveying many, many hundreds of buildings, I would say probably less than five percent are compliant," said Brooks. "I would say that 95 percent are non-compliant in one way, shape, form or another with the [Data Protection] Act. Obviously, that's quite a worrying thing. If the system is non-compliant it could invalidate the usefulness of the evidence in a court of law.
According to Security Industry Authority (SIA) head of investigations, Jennifer Pattinson, the new licenses for individuals means that the operator of CCTV equipment that is monitoring public spaces will likely need to have an SIA license.
On the more sobering side, it appears that an analysis of London's 10,000 cameras show that crime-solving statistics are no better with boroughs covered by many cameras compared to those with few cameras.
In recent years, CCTV has started to permeate into IT as the price of IP-based cameras and storage start to plummet. Does your company use any CCTV? Whose jurisdiction are these CCTV under, and do you think that they serve any practical use in the first place?
Paul Mah is a writer and blogger who lives in Singapore, where he has worked for a number of years in various capacities within the IT industry. Paul enjoys tinkering with tech gadgets, smartphones, and networking devices.