Mobility

Making smartphones smarter - and less creepy

Enterprises can make smartphones smarter, without exploiting users by gathering unnecessary personal data.

 

6334870.jpg
 Photo: Jason Hiner / TechRepublic
 

While I am often amazed at the functionality provided by my smartphone, I’m also surprised at how dumb the device can be. Every night I turn my work phone to “do not disturb,” yet despite its vaunted usability, my iPhone isn’t smart enough to perform this fairly simple task automatically. Even new “intelligent” apps like Google Now lack fairly basic intelligence. Google Now is supposed to proactively alert you to delays in your usual commute, but wasn’t smart enough to realize I was on vacation recently and did not need a commute time from the Cayman Islands to a restaurant that Google somehow had concluded was my workplace.

Intelligence versus parochialism

Our smartphones have all the tools to act in a more intelligent manner. They know our location, intimate details about our lives ranging from who we communicate with to how active we are, and what our schedule looks like months in advance.

Contextual knowledge, intelligence about what activity we’re performing and where we’re performing it, has long been cited as the next innovation in smartphones. Our devices already have all the information to do seemingly intelligent things like pull up the PowerPoint for the meeting that we’re heading to, or informing our spouse that we’ll be home a few minutes later from work due to an accident or a long-running meeting.

Despite having this information available, one of the main obstacles to more intelligent smartphones is that our data is often segregated among multiple applications and the underlying operating system, each of which jealously guards its knowledge about us. Furthermore, most of these applications have been created by companies that are likely more concerned with leveraging our data to sell to other companies than providing a superior user experience.

The enterprise “customer” advantage

One of the main challenges to smarter mobile devices is determining who the customer of many mobile applications actually is. The preponderance of “free” consumer applications often harvest data about their users, selling those data to the “true” customers: advertisers and other companies that pay dearly for these data.

Enterprises generally don’t have these concerns and, in an interesting twist to the trend toward consumer-driven innovation, can actually deliver contextual intelligence to end users rather than selling it to marketers. For example, a warehouse application might act differently when a mobile device is out on the shop floor versus when it’s in the office and might be used for reporting rather than data gathering. A smartphone might sense a worker’s movements in a high-risk environment and, rather than “phoning home” to sell marketing data, might report movements that indicate the worker has fallen or passed out and needs help.

Furthermore, rather than being focused on gathering individual data, enterprises are likely to find aggregate data more helpful. In which buildings or sections of a plant are employees spending most of their time? Which routes do workers take to service a piece of equipment that’s out in the field? How long is it taking to service the average sales call? Gathering aggregate data can be likened to key performance metrics, and the effect of initiatives meant to improve those metrics can be quickly and accurately measured.

Avoiding “creep”

As with advertisers, it’s tempting to gather all manner of information from employee devices and have those devices track, scold, and monitor employees around the clock in what amounts to a creepy effort at best, and an unethical or illegal manner at worst. While courts have historically sided with employers on questions of monitoring use of employer-provided technology, these lines have grown blurry with increasingly personal data available from smart, mobile devices. Rather than immediately running to the lawyers to see what you can get away with, assemble a working group of employees who might be impacted by “smarter” devices and gauge their reactions to your plans.

While commercial interests have driven much of the location- and contextually-aware functionality of today’s mobile devices, enterprises might just be in a unique position to commercially exploit the functionality without exploiting the user generating the data.

About

Patrick Gray works for a global Fortune 500 consulting and IT services company and is the author of Breakthrough IT: Supercharging Organizational Value through Technology as well as the companion e-book The Breakthrough CIO's Companion. He has spent ...

4 comments
junk
junk

Android has quiet time and call blocking settings, so I can't imagine that the iPhone doesn't have something similar.  There's a free Android app which lets you automatically control ringer and notifications based on either time of day and day of week, or GPS location, or even WiFi systems detected. (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=polis.app.volumcontrol) Maybe you need to cough up the Apple KoolAid and drink yourself some 'droid!

andrew.pearson
andrew.pearson

Also the examples you cite are surely what apps are meant to solve. It's not necessarily the phone's purpose as that would mean adding a huge amount of capability to the OS to cover all eventualities which not everyone would need

andrew.pearson
andrew.pearson

" my iPhone isn’t smart enough to perform this fairly simple task automatically" - er yes it is!

It is obviously smarter than you. Go to Settings scroll down a fraction, click on "Do not disturb" and set the schedule to whatever suits!