Leadership

Prioritize projects to align with strategic plan

Every project should support your company's strategic plan. Here's how project management relates to the strategic planning process. Also, get tips on how to make sure planning and projects work together.
Editor's note: This article was originally published March 27, 2003.

Project management is rapidly becoming a standard way of doing business in many organizations. The key to productivity is often found in how we manage projects, which are the tools of implementing the business strategy of an organization.

Every project in an organization should contribute to its strategic plan. But how can we ensure this linkage? We need to make sure that we integrate projects within the strategic plan. This integration requires a process for prioritizing projects by their contribution to the plan. In this article, we will introduce the strategic planning process and how it relates to project management.

The strategic management process

In customer-driven organizations, mission and goals are set to meet the needs of the customers. The mission typically covers "what we want to become" and should be communicated throughout the organization. Goals translate the mission into specific, measurable, and tangible terms. The goals answer in detail where a corporation is heading or when it is going to get there. These goals should set targets for all levels of the organization. Each level of the organizational objectives should support the higher-level objectives in more detail.

The development of strategies to meet these needs and goals should focus on "what we need to do to achieve these goals." It requires an extensive analysis of the internal and external environments. Based on a political, economic, social, and technological analysis (PEST), we analyze the external environment to identify opportunities and threats. We analyze the internal environment by looking for strengths and weaknesses such as management, facilities, core competencies, product quality, technology, and financial resources. The deliverable of this analysis is a set of strategies designed to best meet the needs of the customers.

Implementation of these strategies requires actions and completing tasks, and should focus on how to realize these strategies. Implementation must include attention to the following key points:

  • Executing the work requires allocation of resources such as funds, people, and equipment. Organizational resources are limited. In addition, multiple goals frequently impose conflicting demands on resources. This requires a mechanism for allocating resources based on organizational priorities.
  • Implementation requires an organizational structure that supports projects.
  • Project management processes for planning, executing, and controlling are essential to ensure that we are able to implement strategies effectively and efficiently.
  • We need a project selection and priority system to ensure strong linkages between projects and the strategic plan.
The strategic management process and its relationship to projects is shown in Figure A: Figure A

Figure A

Need for a project selection and priority system

The need for a project selection and priority system stems from the following observations:

  • Organizations frequently pursue many projects simultaneously. Almost inevitably, the number of small and large projects in a portfolio exceeds the available resources such as funds, equipment, and competencies.
  • Politics exist in every organization and can have a significant impact on project selection. Many projects within companies are called "sacred cows." We often use this term to describe a project sponsored by a high-ranking executive.

Without an effective project selection and priority system, the capacity overload coupled with project politics will lead to frustration, confusion, and inefficient use of resources.

Questions that need answers

Some of the questions that we need to tackle when considering a project selection and priority system are:

  • How can we minimize the power of politics?
  • How can we consistently prioritize projects to support the organizational strategy?
  • How can we use the prioritized list of projects to allocate organizational scarce resources?
  • How can the process encourage bottom-up initiation of projects that support organizational goals and strategies?

We are always going to have more potential projects or proposals than the capacity of the organizational resources would allow for. Thus, we need a systematic process that will select projects and allocate resources to these projects in order to maximize value added. Selection of projects from a slate of projects requires the use of a decision model in association with specific criteria.

The benefits of carefully selected criteria include the following:

  • More effective planning of organizational resources
  • More efficient utilization of organizational resources
  • A portfolio of projects that balance opportunities and threats given available resources
  • Keeping the organization stakeholders focused on the most critical projects
  • Obtaining consensus as to which projects have the highest priority

Nevertheless, when we implement a project selection and priority system in our organization, we meet enormous skepticism and resistance.

Typical responses include:

  • We all know which projects are the most important ones.
  • All of our projects are important.
  • Our business is changing on a daily basis. We do not need an extra layer of bureaucracy, which limits our flexibility.

Responses such as the above suggest a serious need for a project selection and priority system. Nevertheless, the development and the implementation of such a system does not materialize without the support and sponsorship of upper management.

A project management approach to business problems and opportunities is becoming the norm rather than the exception. Projects are the tools for implementing the strategy of the organization. Effective project management starts with selecting and prioritizing projects that support the organizational mission and strategy. The priority system focuses attention on the mission and major goals of the organization and fosters consensus to which projects are of highest priority. It results in a portfolio of projects that balance threats and opportunities and provides a better utilization of resources.

Up next

In the next article in this two-part series, we'll look at several tools and techniques you can use in selecting and prioritizing projects.

Related resources

Get weekly PM tips in your inbox TechRepublic's IT Project Management newsletter, delivered on Wednesday, offers tips to help keep project managers and their teams on track. Automatically sign up today!
8 comments
dnakng
dnakng

Toyota has developed an elegant planning and execution system called "Strategy Deployment" or "Policy Deployment" that helps a company do just what the article suggests. There are many sources to read if you Google it, but one of the best is a free webinar at the Lean Enterprise Institute website called "Strategy Deployment What Is It? Why Should I Care?" by Pascal Dennis.

gail-mick
gail-mick

Hi - I agree entirely. However, I would take this one step further. Resource allocation is also an issue for initiated projects. Therefore, the prioritisation process needs to continue beyound selection as resources (people) may have to be chopped and changed. How would you propose this would be managed?

jperick.mbei
jperick.mbei

This is a great article. Nevertheless, I would like to take the opportunity to clarify two items. You write: "The mission typically covers 'what we want to become'". I think that there is need to make a distinction between a mission statement and a vision statement. There is a confusion between these two important concepts,understandably. In fact, the confusion between mission statement and vision statement is so deep, and so annoying that in many corporate Websites, it is common to see mission statements embedded into vision statements, and inversely. That confusion caused a corporate CEO (quoted by Zairi, M., 1998) to say: "I've come to believe that we need a vision to guide us, but can't seem to get my hands on what 'vision' is. I've heard lots of terms like 'mission', 'purpose', 'values, 'strategic intent', but no one has given me a satisfactory way of looking at vision that will help me to sort out this morass of words and set a coherent vision for my company. It's really frustrating!" With that in m ind, a vision statement seems to set a cultural direction, and implies what the company or organization wants to be like in the future, as opposed to its competitors. On the other hand, a mission statement is goal-setting. Actionable items that are tied to the mission are, in nature factual because they can be quantified, measured in terms of how many, how much (i.e., production, sales, financial statements and thus revenues/profits). Look at the following: Vision: "To be recognized as and excellent...." Mission: "To secure...a more competitive position in its target markets by improving margins through quality improvement in all parts of Manufacturing Division". A look at the mission statement above brings me to quantifiable concepts: Target Markets, Margins (profit margin, and so on), all parts...". Another point worth making is that, mission statements tend to support organizational vision. While companies/organizations usually change their missions (strategically and tactically), a vision does not change often. It is like our US Constitution. You change it only in extreme and necessary conditions. Vision and Mission are intrinsically linked, the confusion not withstanding, I would welcome other readers' insight on this matter. Jean-Pierre E. Mbei, MBA, MS Systems Consultant Information Assurance Analyst

generapharm
generapharm

This is a seminal paper...I am a pharmaceutical consultant..not IT but its the same principle. Almost every company I work with has little or zero connection between strategy [set somewhere in the rarefied atmosphere of the boardroom] and the actual way projects are selected and run.

sue.ctr.meeks
sue.ctr.meeks

Start with strategic, then create the tactical. Once you accomplish the strategic, it becomes a core business function which allows you to free up resources for the next strategic priority. If you start with strategic, you can map resources, tools and processes to the goal.

connied
connied

I cannot agree more. I can relate to what the article is conveying in that ???politics exist in every organization and can have a significant impact on project selection???. I think all functional units in an organization need to do the right things right for that organization to achieve operational excellence and to stay competative. How can we do that unless we align projects with strategies? Having said that, is there any better way out there than applying a standardized project selection process to do right things right at right time? Connie D runningpc@comcast.net Programming Department Manager, Glenview, IL

The 'G-Man.'
The 'G-Man.'

Yesterday it was align with processes Today it align with stratigic plan What tomorrow? The article is fine but there is so much conflicting information out there about what to actually align to. Someone will no doubt say align to all of them, but then that is impossible as the generally conflict.

gail-mick
gail-mick

Processes are set up to help the company to achieve the reason it exists. Therefore process are helping the company to achieve strategy. It therefore makes sense to align to strategy as the process underlines the strategy - if that makes sense

Editor's Picks