Windows

Bill Gates reveals new details about Windows Home Server at WinHEC


Yesterday, in his keynote to kick off the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) in Los Angeles, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates provided a slew of new details about Windows Home Server, including key announcements about hardware and software partners, and he stated that the product will be released this fall.

"With Windows Home Server, we’re launching a new category of consumer products that will make it much easier for people to connect to their digital content and share experiences with friends and family no matter where they are," said Gates.

"We've got a lot of new partners who are helping us with this... It's important to note that this is a platform. Because you've got Windows capability, we're already seeing these partners and software companies build on to the functionality that's there in the Home Server. What we've done is make sure that the built-in functionality is strong enough that a multi-PC household is going to find this the simplest and the best way to manage their information."

WHS partners
  • Hewlett-Packard, Gateway, LaCie, and Medion have all signed on as OEM partners to build products based on Windows Home Server. At the right, you can see a photo of the HP MediaSmart Server, which will be based on Windows Home Server.
  • Microsoft will also offer the software to small systems builders to produce their own WHS appliances; this is similar to the old "white box" PC clone strategy.
  • F-Secure will provide a virus protection solution.
  • Both Embedded Automation and Lagotek will be integrating WHS as a control center for home automation solution.
  • PacketVideo will enable media streaming from WHS to other devices in the home.
  • Riptopia will provide a service for converting an entire music CD collection to WHS for storage and backup.
  • Iron Mountain will offer data protection services.
  • Diskeeper will provide its utility software for enhancing file system speed and reliability.

Microsoft is also encouraging developers to get involved as partners by announcing the "Windows Home Server Code2Fame Challenge," which will award prizes of $10,000, $5,000 and $1,000 to the first, second, and third place winners, respectively, in both the hardware and software categories. Microsoft recently released the Software Development Kit for WHS in order to give developers the tools to build add-ons to the product.

WHS functionality

The most significant product feature that was revealed (and it might have already been in the WHS Beta, but I just didn't notice) was that WHS can be used to monitor and manage all of the PCs on its network. For example, it can provide an alert when firewall or antivirus software is turned off on any of the PCs on the network, and it can provide the ability to turn it back on from the server.

Microsoft also provided a topology diagram for a home network powered by a Windows Home Server (and, of course, running a host of other Microsoft technologies):

My perspective

Last week, I wrote about the fact that Windows Home Server beta has impressed my colleague Shawn Morton. At the end of that article, I posted a poll, asking whether TechRepublic users saw a Windows Home Server in their future. Of the 650 responses to the poll (at the time that I'm writing this), 88% of them either plan to buy a Windows Home Server or are seriously considering it.

Yesterday's announcements shouldn't do anything to dampen their enthusiasm, since Microsoft partners are clearly building an ecosystem of solutions to support and extend Windows Home Server.

However, there is still one important issue hanging out there: will Microsoft sell the software separately so that IT pros and power users can install it on their own hardware? In my poll, 49% of respondents said that they would prefer to buy WHS as software and install it themselves. Now, this won't likely be the preference for the larger body of WHS users, but for TechRepublic's highly-technical audience, this is a key consideration.

Gates stated yesterday, "We'll also have a version of this Home Server SKU available to system builders, so people who put together custom systems even in quite limited volume, this software capability is something that they'll be able to load onto it."

That's not quite the same as releasing a boxed version of the software, but it probably means that IT pros and power users will be able to buy an OEM copy of Windows Home Server from Newegg.com and similar vendors, as I suggested last week. I have requested Microsoft to comment further on this issue, and I'm waiting to hear back from them this morning. I will post an update when I get a response.

Your take?

Do these new developments make you more interested in Windows Home Server? How important will it be for you to be able to buy it as software? What kind of price point are you hoping for? Join the discussion.



UPDATE: 1:50 PM EST, Wednesday, May 16

I spoke to Joel Sider, senior product manager of Windows Home Server, and asked him about the target demographic for the product and whether Microsoft would release the product as software.

"Our primary focus is providing an easy solution to consumers," said Joel. "This product is aimed at households that have more than one PC, and a broadband connection."

According to Microsoft's research, that translates into 15 million households in the U.S. and about 50 million worldwide.

"We're not going to be providing [Windows Home Server] as boxed software," Joel stated. "Our focus is on this mainstream audience that we want to provide with a hardware/software solution. We think that's the best way to ensure a quality user experience."

I mentioned to Joel that last week's TechRepublic poll showed 49% of respondents wanted to install Windows Home Server on their own hardware and that if it wasn't available as retail software then people would likely purchase OEM copies from NewEgg, as they've done with Windows XP Media Center in the past. "We're aware of that," he said. "It does happen." But he reiterated that Microsoft is focused on Windows Home Server as an appliance in order to serve the broader audience.

So we've finally got the official word. There will be no retail edition of the Windows Home Server OS. That's not really a surprise -- the tea leaves had been reading that way for a while -- but it is still disappointing, at least for techies.

About

Jason Hiner is Editor in Chief of TechRepublic and Long Form Editor of ZDNet. He writes about the people, products, and ideas changing how we live and work in the 21st century. He's co-author of the upcoming book, Follow the Geeks (bit.ly/ftgeeks).

6 comments
dryflies
dryflies

That is what I really want to know. with a teenager in the house. I really want to manage how late she is online and limit her access at certain times. kill myspace during Home work hour, boot her at 11pm on school nights etc.

jasonhiner
jasonhiner

Windows Home Server might deliver, but you'll probably need Windows Vista on your daughter's machine. WHS doesn't have Active Directory or Group Policy. However, Windows Vista provides the capability to do what you're talking about in terms of limiting your daughter's access. This kind of access control is actually the most useful feature - along with desktop search - that I've discovered so far in Vista. I think Windows Home Server will allow you to configure these Vista access settings from the server, but I haven't tested that yet so don't hold me to it.

Jacky Howe
Jacky Howe

I would prefer Software. That way I can put my own OEM PC's together. My test PC is running to smoothe. It might be time to throw something at it. Pricing? I can almost guarantee that it will be overpriced like all of M$ software. It will probably fall somewhere between XPPro and Win2003.

Craig Herberg
Craig Herberg

It looks like MS has bolted Vista's parental controls to IE7, so anyone using another browser, such as Firefox, should completely bypass them. A third-party software package like Webroot's Child Safe would probably be more likely to do the job. Craig Herberg http://info-safety.com

bill
bill

While I can understand the financial incentive for Microsoft to once again tie their browser software to their products, I really believe this is one area where they should have forgotten about their fight for browser market share. With all the predator-types on the prowl and the trash being posted everywhere, MS should have thought more about protecting kids, even if it meant more cost/code/production time. Bill Gates and his wife do WONDERFUL things in the world through their foundation, I wish some of their unselfishness could have been reflected in this corporate decision. Yes, business is business, but if you want to be a respected leader in anything, you sometimes have to make selfless decisions.

Editor's Picks