How to price cloud services

Thoran Rodrigues offers tips on setting a pricing structure for cloud services from a provider's perspective. Understanding this model will also help cloud service users find the right agreement.

When it comes to services, pricing is a very sensitive issue. While having a good pricing strategy may not be a competitive advantage, having the wrong price structure can mean disaster. The wrong price, at the very least, means reduced profits, but it may also lead a company into cash flow problems and, eventually, bankruptcy. On the cloud, everything - platform, infrastructure, and software - is sold "as-a-service" -- that is, based on some sort of usage metric. This allows for a much broader range of pricing strategies, letting companies experiment with different models as they go along. At the same time, this broader range of options holds increased risks for mistakes and that's what we all want to avoid.

When pricing goes bad

In his book "Behind the Cloud", Marc Benioff, the CEO of Salesforce.com, discussed how the company had trouble with its pricing model early on. They charged customers on a monthly basis -- exactly what would be expected from a cloud service -- but, at the same time, salespeople received commissions based on the yearly value of the contract. When sales rapidly increased, the commissions to be paid quickly overtook the income, leading to cash flow troubles. The way out was both to change the way commissions were paid and to promote long-term plans where customers would receive a discount if they paid a whole year in advance.

The recent woes of Netflix offer another interesting example of how the wrong pricing structure can hurt a company. Netflix's DVD-by-mail service closely resembles a cloud service, differing only on the delivery mechanism: customers pay a monthly fee that gives them access to movies delivered straight to them, similar to what would happen with a cloud-based application suite. When the company misjudged the perceived values of its services and tried to raise prices, customers defected in droves and the stock price fell dramatically, wiping out shareholder value.

These are cases of pricing going really bad, endangering the company, and they are pretty easy to recognize. The most dangerous case, however, is when pricing seems to be working fine. You may work complex calculations and come up with a price that seems to result in profits, but hides some costs that can ultimately result in losses. If a service is priced based on an expected consumption of resources (CPU, for instance), but the real average is much higher, it can quickly lead to disaster.

What is left for me then?

Not everything is a bad, however. By keeping some tips in mind and taking previous experience into consideration, you can pave your way into profits! Research shows, for instance, that when people pay for services for a long time beforehand (such as paying for a yearly plan), they tend to use the service heavily on the first months, but they tend to gradually abandon that service. When they make frequent payments, however, their usage is more even over time. This means that companies can make use of discount packages not only to promote longer term contracts, but to adjust usage levels as well.

Another thing to keep in mind is that recent research has shown that certain pricing models can achieve much higher profitability than others. When infrastructure is purchased on the cloud, for instance, the way that we are charged is very similar to the way we are charged for mobile phone services: every person pays a fee based on the usage time - unlike with software, where we usually pay a flat monthly fee. On this situation, however, the phone companies are more efficient than cloud providers. They use a package-based model, where the users pay a flat fee for a package that gives them the right to a certain usage level, and have to pay a much larger fee for excess usage.

This model allows for the optimization of both usage and profits. Light users pay a higher usage fee, but can receive some discount since they will probably not exceed their limit. Heavy users, on the other hand, can receive an attractive discount. In both cases, the excess usage fees can easily cover any expenses generated by some client going over the limit. At the same time, the package model is also interesting for clients. It allows for much better planning of expenses over time, which is very important for companies of all sizes.

The cloud offers a lot of room for experimentation with prices, both to providers and consumers, and my recommendation is to try things out and experiment as much as possible with different pricing models to see what fits best. As the examples show us, not thinking about pricing or making incorrect assumptions can result in reduced profits or even major disaster for companies who sell services. And, for everyone who is purchasing a service on the cloud, understanding the ideas behind the pricing model adopted by providers can allow for better usage of the services, or even to negotiating better discounts.


After working for a database company for 8 years, Thoran Rodrigues took the opportunity to open a cloud services company. For two years his company has been providing services for several of the largest e-commerce companies in Brazil, and over this t...


I was a little excited when I clicked on the link to read the article because I really want to know some of ???the prices that providers are offering. Although this article was informative to some level, especially to any ???new wanna be a cloud business provider; it didn't go deep into finding who are the companies out there ???that are providing cloud services and comparison wise. True that you want to unbiased, and I know that ???such article would require much more in-depth analysis and research, but it would be very helpful for ???people like me and others that are looking into sustainable, efficient and cost effective providers.???

HAL 9000
HAL 9000

Easy answer is they don't exist. What you are asking for is a service that saves you money while offering a better solution than you yourself can put in place. Along with the necessary insurance Cover for any Data Breach and the important thing who owns the data in the case of the [i]Public[/i] Cloud Provider going broke, and some sort of guarantee that you can access your Data [b]Immediately[/b] that the Provider ceases business and not have to enter into long negations with an [b]Appointed Receiver[/b] who may have already on sold your data before allowing you to buy it back. You would also want some sort of Guarantee that if this organisation is holding your Data and this is [b]Mission Critical[/b] that in the event of any form of Financial Issues arising you can [b]Immediately[/b] recover your Data from them so as to continue your Business. Of course Insurance isn't going to protect you for a Data Breach by the Authorities who have the Law on their Side and use parts of it to look at your companies data under the [I]Official Wire Tap[/i] Laws as it's not under your control and is now subject to the more Draconian Anti Terror Legislation that has passed in most parts of the world. Col

Editor's Picks