<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on 100mb Internet connection - Which firewall / appliance should I use? ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/101-395469]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/101-395469/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-26T02:16:14-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[100mb Internet connection - Which firewall / appliance should I use?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/101-395469-3707436]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[HelloI recently upgraded to a 100mb internet connection and had spec'd up a checkpoint 2200 appliance. This was great because it's an all in one solution.  It handles URL filtering, content filtering, SSL inspection, IPS etc. etc. However, they run using Intel Atoms and cannot handle a 100mb connection with such features running.  So I am going back to the drawing board but the costs involved are pretty big (15k) and up.  The quesiton I have is what do people recommend for this sort of connection? looking after 150 users?  Where should I be looking / heading]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/101-395469-3707436]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[scottchapm@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:03:07 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

