And the point of this article is...
I fail to see what purpose of this article. Is it about gorilla marketing tactics? Or maybe it is about the various ways IT people can determine that there is a difference between good, better, and best graphics (like we already didn't know this). Or, maybe this is about Windows Vista requiring high-end hardware for a better-than-good experience. Does this mean we all will need to trade in our junkers in order to experience the true benefits of a nature of this OS? "Conclusion"? Conclusion to what? You had to wait for a people to write about their experience with Windows Vista to determine that computers configured differently might also perform differently. Why wait? Go to Tom's Hardware next time or some other site with benchmark test results. It's no wonder why people don't buy into Microsoft operating systems and products when people have no other information about a product except to say It works better on a high-end computer. Come on...
