<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Microsoft announces security bulletin changes ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T13:57:24-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Electrons Do What Electrons Do]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927-2237011]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[In all things electronic, those little electrons do what you tell them. As with computers the machine language (routines) were designed of the ages to tell the computer what to do, when to do it, how to do it, how fast to do, or don't do it at this time. Everything is subject to break due to the lack of care and maintenance, as you might think I am a maintenance tech, I find a little more memory, reorganizing that ever increasing data workload with simple program built in to Windows called defrag, chkdsk, or whatevers use of these can have the cat jumping from a hot tin roof plenty quick. No one ever has time for daily maintenance until it's broke. Please do not blame the computer for it's lack of direction it's just awaiting your command(s).]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927-2237011]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[donaldcoe@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 06:29:27 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Questionable comparison]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927-2236929]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[On the other hand, I personally make my own pizza from scratch and, although they are not always perfect, we very seldom need to throw one to the dogs. I don?t even use a recipe.But a pizza oven only has to do one thing - provide controlled heat.I once built a computer from scratch ? it involved physical relays and big X and O panels. It worked fine too till a relay burned out.That computer only played a game.I haven?t tried designing a CPU from scratch or writing 12 million lines of code to get it to do hundreds of thousands of things.The more complex something is, the harder it is to keep it running perfectly. If you compare a computer to the space shuttle (for the number of interacting components) instead of a pizza oven (controlled heat is the only factor), then you might feel as I do that PCs work pretty well ? mine run for years without any major problem.Add to that the fact that people make computers/software and computer problems are always the fault of those people and you may come to believe that today's PCs are actually remarkable tools.My main argument with them is what people use them for (such as creating malware).]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927-2236929]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech Locksmith]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 05:47:15 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[PERFECT SOFTWARE IN PERFECT COMPUTERS]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927-2236344]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[If I had to worry about the pizza oven in my restaurant working correctly how could I maintain a business?I would call in the oven repair person and the oven would be fixed.With computers this is not so.Computers never get fixed,they always run poorly!]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927-2236344]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[BALTHOR]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:38:34 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Improvement]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927-2236211]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I think the order of the information is an improvement.I see many links to go back to the top of the section and top of the page.Links down to sections might be helpful.Some of the detail should be collapsed on initial view, too much detail. I do not mind clicking a plus sign to show needed detail.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-222927-2236211]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[gshollingsworth]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 10:40:58 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

