<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Coming this week: News, announcements, and new products from Interop Las Vegas 2007 ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-223322]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-223322/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-23T01:36:01-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Misguided Redirect]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-223322-2240363]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[It wears me out that I clicked a link in my newsletter that indicated that Samsung was entering the enterprise networking racket and arrived here. It's dishonest, disheartening, and downright disrepectful to post a link that when followed, only marginally contains even the slightest reference to the original subject. Nothing personal, but how does the TechRepublic newsletter's link policy differ from any loathesome spam I get with bait n switch refernces?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-223322-2240363]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Whirl3d]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 03:06:02 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[ITIL and OSI Layer1 (Cable Management)]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-223322-2240374]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Jason, if you are there... could you have a look at the available options for automatically documenting Layer 1 connectivity. We are using ITIL as our IT frame-work and one of the weak areas is keeping reliable documentation/audit trail on our network cabling to fill our CMDB.I've been told there are solutions out there which can do this for me. One of them being iPatch by Systimax Solutions and another is by Tyco... both are exibiting at INTEROP. I think a lot of people will be faced with similar issues as myself and it would be great if you could see what options are out there and how they compare. Having looked at both Systimax's and Tyco's website I find it hard to compare the two. Will be eagerly monitoring this thread to see what you can come up with ]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-223322-2240374]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Keadean]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:58:17 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[What are you interested in hearing from Interop Las Vegas this week?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-223322-2238825]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I'll be at Interop this week:http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=479Let me know if there are any topics, products, or vendors that you are interested in learning more about. Also, let me know if you have any specific questions about products or vendors and I will try to flag down someone to respond to your question(s).]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-223322-2238825]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[jasonhiner]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 08:46:08 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

