<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on P2P clients used for DoS attacks ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-224917]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-224917/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-25T17:14:10-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Not Just P2P]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-224917-2249157]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[DoS attacks are also ( and most have been since at least '99 ) caused by C++ apps, VBScript apps, .Net apps, Java apps, and application apps. P2P is nothing special, and DC+ accounts ( per Nethack statistics ) are about 10% of the P2P 'market', with apps like eMule, Limewire, bittorrent, etc far outnumbering DC+. Btw, P2P by definition is not a client server model, it is Peer to Peer model, in which there is not a client application.However, its good to let DC+ users know about the vulnerability mentioned in the article, but the article's title should have been &quot;DC+ App Vulnerability Used in DoS Attacks&quot;. &quot;P2P&quot; is just too general.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-224917-2249157]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[TheGooch1]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:29:02 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

