<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Manage patch deployment with these five steps ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T23:07:24-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Mike Brodock    Slamham HI BRO]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-3497122]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I think Mike could make it easier for Sir Scarfsalot to find him!!Try hot chocolate in the server!stevenandsandra@comcast.net]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-3497122]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[folsom6]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:11:28 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: Manage patch deployment with these five steps]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2290837]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Can Somebody throw some light as to what kind of testing is required when a patch is deployed, for example on an DNS + ADS server what kind of testing are to be done and what are the parameters to be noted while testing.Thanks In advance.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2290837]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[asgr86@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: Manage patch deployment with these five steps]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2285871]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Is there a documentation process? For example, is there a document, which can be given to the Engineer, who executes the patch installation process?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2285871]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[nbalaj@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:44:02 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Is WSUS 3.0 a compelling upgrade?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2281961]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Other than support of Vista and new versions of Office, do you find the reasons to upgrade from WSUS 2.0 to 3.0 compelling?  Or is this your first WSUS implementation in your organization?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2281961]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[dkenny@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:30:07 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[SMS]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2281693]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Use SMS to deploy the packages for patching, etc.  Or look at Shavlik HFNetchk, thought it had additional functionality.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2281693]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[livedthere]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:21:48 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: Manage patch deployment with these five steps]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2281649]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Retro77I agree WSUS 3.0 is fine, but it's only deploying patches to MS software, what about the rest of the products that you are using, i.e. Adobe Acrobat (Reader), winzip, to name a couple of common apps that you would expect to find on a standard deployment, how do you go about patching these?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2281649]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[bullens@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:48:36 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: Manage patch deployment with these five steps]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2278627]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[6. AutomateThe less you have to touch your end user systems the better. I am currently using WSUS 3.0 and it works.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2278627]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[retro77@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:59:38 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[How could anyone ask?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2278573]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Too few? What could possibly be the answer to that question? &quot;We want more unpatched systems!&quot;? Hahaha...I agree, whole-heartedly, with Mr. Brodock. I relish my horizontal time!Kudos, Mike.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2278573]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mond0]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:30:58 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Too many...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2278416]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[managers seem to think that a couple (or more) workstations or servers that are unpatched is ok.  Bad thinking in my opinion and experience.  I can't really give details but having had to fight off viruses a couple of times still hasn't convinced some that one unpatched machine is too many.  At least I get more money but I would rather just sleep well at night and be a pit poorer in pocket and richer in spirit.I really liked this article as well as most of your writings.  Thanks and keep up the good work.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2278416]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[michael.brodock@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:58:49 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Un-patched]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2278358]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Is one un-patched workstation/server to many or too few.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-229721-2278358]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Mullins]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:19:51 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

