<![CDATA[Discussion on Improve Windows XP Pro's NTFS performance by disabling the Accessed timestamp ]]> en-us 2013-06-19T05:56:11-07:00 <![CDATA[Sure, disable it, and lose]]> Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:28:46 -0800 <![CDATA[That's what we needed]]> Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:04:56 -0800 <![CDATA[The Advantages of Disabling "Last Access" Attribute]]> Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:01:18 -0800 <![CDATA[Not at all (edit: OK, a caveat)]]> Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:46:31 -0800 <![CDATA[Yeah, most definitely for security audits!]]> Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:37:22 -0800 <![CDATA[What would be nice - temporily disable it]]> Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:34:40 -0800 <![CDATA[It doesn't affect backups]]> Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:53:23 -0800 <![CDATA[Re: concerns]]> Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:01:42 -0800 <![CDATA[Improve Windows XP Home Edition?s NTFS performance]]> Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:06:53 -0800 <![CDATA[RE: Improve Windows XP Pro's NTFS performance by disabling the Accessed timestamp]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:25:36 -0800 <![CDATA[LastAccessed use]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:15:04 -0800 <![CDATA[what about security audits?]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:44:13 -0800 <![CDATA[I see no advantage in disabling this attibute.]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:55:26 -0800 <![CDATA[Date Modified?]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:39:56 -0800 <![CDATA[no, it's permanent, and....]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:07:22 -0800 <![CDATA[Yes, this can affect backups and also remote storage]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:48:17 -0800 <![CDATA[Changes file header not file contents]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:43:28 -0800 <![CDATA[Concerns]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:04:00 -0800 <![CDATA[RE: Improve Windows XP Pro's NTFS performance by disabling the Accessed timestamp]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:43:36 -0800 <![CDATA[Affect Backups? File Synchs?]]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:20:32 -0800