If I remember correctly...
...you were injecting noise into my comment regarding my prediction that there will be those that think it "unfair" that people who only purchase subsidized goods will be subjected to seemingly endless advertising whereas those who pay more for unsubsidized goods will not. You could not seem to differentiate between my observation and prediction and my supposed advocacy, which are not the same thing.
2: I agree in that the health care industry as practiced in this country is hopelessly screwed up by government intervention (either directly via mandate or indirectly via the tax code) and gross ignorance by a substantial percentage of the population as to what "insurance" really is. (What most people today consider "insurance" is actually a "payment plan"; economically, two very different concepts)
3: It will not be "Advertising" in and of itself that will be protested. It will be the fact that there will be people who are able/willing to pay more (a premium, if you will) to exist with products and in environments that will be free of advertising, while there will be many who choose not. (In much the same way that those who choose not to purchase health insurance resent those who do) This will be promulgated by those forwarding the "wealth envy" political agenda.
