Seriously? This again?
> I read it an it seemed to make some sense and offer insight that I thought was informative. After reading comments here I find that most feel otherwise, most who know FAR more than I care to on the subject.
"Most" in this case is basically one out of every five or six people. I recommend you learn how to count.
On the other hand, you seem to think that quantity of negative respondents is more important than the quality of what they have to say, anyway, so I'm not sure it much matters whether you learn to count. If you base your impression of whether something is true or not on so superficial and error-prone a set of criteria, you'll only make a correct judgment occasionally by accident.
Somehow, an intelligent person like Tony Hopkinson was able to figure out pretty quickly that freep didn't even understand the article, let alone the topic -- but you're still willing to take freep's disorganized, unsupported word for the stupidity of the article over the word of people who actually have intelligent things to say in this thread.
