Split hairs . . . ?
> Way to defend your comments, split hairs I was about to reply with kudos I then found that, just as you do with other subjects you pretend to have insight into, that your information is to be questioned and is not all seemingly fact. when you speak of subjects you have little or know experience with I know as a fact that you don't get it, you are FAR too defensive to admit it even if you agreed. The problem is, you are credible one minute and speculative and incorrect the next.
Speculation is not necessarily incorrect, and any speculations I make are clearly labeled as such. I never (unless I have done so once or twice by accident, but I doubt it) claim that mere speculations are factual statements, I never set out to mislead with my articles, and I never say half the things you attribute to me.
