Is the SyncLock statement the same as the C# lock statement? and if so then it would also be implemented using a Monitor as it is in C#?
If this is the case it surprises me that the Monitor and SyncLock statements do not have closer results.
Discussion on:
View:
Show:
Monitor is better choice in some scenarios, it does morre so it costs more. In principle it gives you more granular control of locking.
If you only have one grain it's pointless, if your grains are the size of boulders it's also pointless.
If you are comparing these times to what you are getting now, well one or three things have changed since 2006....
If you only have one grain it's pointless, if your grains are the size of boulders it's also pointless.
If you are comparing these times to what you are getting now, well one or three things have changed since 2006....
- Keyboard Shortcuts:
- Prev
- Next
- Toggle
