<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Finally, some actual tools to use in your move to the cloud ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-345146]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-345146/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-06-19T11:26:25-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Whats the hip?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-345146-3458153]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[This has really become old news. If you really want to look at the beginning of cloud services and virtual environments IBM was doing it with main frames years ago.   When are computer geeks going to quit bashing the main frame environment? There is a place in the world for both micro personal computers, server farms and main frame's. If you begin to compare the installation of 30 blade servers as a posed to one main frame then the dollars begin to be a wash. The place where it becomes evident is with power cooling and space. Both platforms have a place and should be used in conjunction.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-345146-3458153]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[gclarkso@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 06:36:54 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

