Discussion on:
View:
Show:
I use Freemind. It's not got the look and feel of the screenshots above, but it's free and does the mindmapping job perfectly.
I used MinManager in a previous job, then switched to Freemind and for the last year or so I've used Xmind (the free version).
Xmind has the features I require, and is pleasant to use. The free software tend to be without features like export to Microsoft Project, but for brainstorming and for following up on tasks they are doing the job as well as the commercial versions.
-Roald
Xmind has the features I require, and is pleasant to use. The free software tend to be without features like export to Microsoft Project, but for brainstorming and for following up on tasks they are doing the job as well as the commercial versions.
-Roald
I've been using these tools for the past 6 years and Freemind provides a basic mind mapping function and Xmind provide similar solutions, the commercial tools are well worth the cost. Freemind has usability issues in the Java applet format and Xmind is nice but constrained by the Eclipse format.
When it comes to usability and integration with other tools, the commercial ones stand above the rest. I still like Mindjet but the features described above in MindGenius are a differentiators for a project manager looking to apply mind mapping to a project.
It all depends on what you want to use mind mapping for and the free tools can accommodate the basic features. As your mind maps grow, you'll want to explore the commercial solutions as well.
Andy
When it comes to usability and integration with other tools, the commercial ones stand above the rest. I still like Mindjet but the features described above in MindGenius are a differentiators for a project manager looking to apply mind mapping to a project.
It all depends on what you want to use mind mapping for and the free tools can accommodate the basic features. As your mind maps grow, you'll want to explore the commercial solutions as well.
Andy
I have been looking for something like this for ages, never had much luck. Thats for the info about freemind. If it works anything like mind genius, then its exactly what I need.
sam - seo tips
sam - seo tips
As usual, your article is incomplete, so readers are served poorly and/or misled.
Editors, please try harder to improve this, as has been pointed out many times.
Average cost per user of the above: around $200.
Average cost per user of the below: exactly $0.
Difference in performance/functions: Trivial to Indistinguishable, for most users.
Best value choice: Reader can decide, but not with incomplete information.
http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
IHTH
Jim-MN
Editors, please try harder to improve this, as has been pointed out many times.
Average cost per user of the above: around $200.
Average cost per user of the below: exactly $0.
Difference in performance/functions: Trivial to Indistinguishable, for most users.
Best value choice: Reader can decide, but not with incomplete information.
http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
IHTH
Jim-MN
I could also say that your comment is incomplete since it doesn't include examples of other times where the author has been incomplete. Essentially, this article is an opinion piece just like your comment is an opinion.
What I would like to know is what makes Mind Map tools more valuable than using spreadsheets or even flip charts to do things like keeping track of risks or parking lot items. Do they save time or include artificial intelligence to improve PM processes or brainstorming?
What I would like to know is what makes Mind Map tools more valuable than using spreadsheets or even flip charts to do things like keeping track of risks or parking lot items. Do they save time or include artificial intelligence to improve PM processes or brainstorming?
Hi Andyf -
Spreadsheets are good for tracking financials and yet even though we use Excel for issue and risk logs, they are not effective word processors. Mind maps provide greater flexibility to track comments, dates, and even attachments to specific issues or risks. You can still use spreadsheets, but mind mapping provides greater flexibility and even creativity.
Flip charts work fine in a conference room as do white boards, but the challenge is capturing the data and then distributing it. Sure you can take a picture or translate it into a Word document...but the better solution is the use a brainstorm capture tool like mind mapping software so the ideas can be quickly captured, formatted and distributed.
I see a lot of time saved in meeting minute distribution and brainstorming.
I previously gave a presentation on Mind Mapping Across the Project Lifecycle for a local PMI chapter. Here is the link the presentation:
http://www.tacticalprojectmanagement.com/mind-mapping-project-management/mind-mapping-across-the-project-lifecycle.html
Give it a shot and I think you'll find it useful in your day to day work...independent of the software application you choose.
Andy Makar
Spreadsheets are good for tracking financials and yet even though we use Excel for issue and risk logs, they are not effective word processors. Mind maps provide greater flexibility to track comments, dates, and even attachments to specific issues or risks. You can still use spreadsheets, but mind mapping provides greater flexibility and even creativity.
Flip charts work fine in a conference room as do white boards, but the challenge is capturing the data and then distributing it. Sure you can take a picture or translate it into a Word document...but the better solution is the use a brainstorm capture tool like mind mapping software so the ideas can be quickly captured, formatted and distributed.
I see a lot of time saved in meeting minute distribution and brainstorming.
I previously gave a presentation on Mind Mapping Across the Project Lifecycle for a local PMI chapter. Here is the link the presentation:
http://www.tacticalprojectmanagement.com/mind-mapping-project-management/mind-mapping-across-the-project-lifecycle.html
Give it a shot and I think you'll find it useful in your day to day work...independent of the software application you choose.
Andy Makar
Hi Jim - I wrote the article so I'd like to understand what is incomplete and how "as usual", readers are served poorly and misled.
Unless this is just comment blog spam, I'm missing your meaning in the comment.
Andy
Unless this is just comment blog spam, I'm missing your meaning in the comment.
Andy
Hi, Andy, and thanks for following up.
(Note: I have no relationship whatsoever to SourceForge or its FreeMind project, so no, this is not "comment blog spam", and I receive no benefit from them except many of their excellent free products just like everyone else can.)
Sorry I wasn't more clear, though I still think I was _adequately_ clear. My comment, "Editors, please try harder to improve this, as has been pointed out many times," was directed at the Editors, not any author(s). My goal is to reduce the occurrence of articles that purport to include a market survey (as yours does IMHO) but leave out significant players (as your does). TechRepublic editors often allow this shortcoming in their publications, and many of us readers complain about it often, as it causes us more work (to do our own research to confirm or refute the authors' conclusions) and it reduces our opinion of the value of TechReplublic publications, so in effect we are trying to help TR improve their service, which would in turn benefit all readers, and presumably would also benefit TR in some tangible way, e.g. more advertising revenue due to increased market share.
My post is a specific application to your article of my general belief/principle:
When you go beyond just raving about MindGenius (which would have been just fine, and in line with the title of your article) and begin _implying_ that it is the "best deal", you incur the responsibility to be "fair" (maybe a better word would be "complete", which is the word I chose) and include _all_ the significant contenders, which FreeMind certainly is, again IMHO, and in the opinion of many presumed experts. For example, it has more "Likes" than _all_ the other alternatives _combined_, on http://alternativeto.net/software/mindgenius/, and there are hundreds of similar posts. When cost to obtain software is considered, which is so important to so many small businesses etc. nowadays, it is hard to beat its value-per-cost: It's nearly infinite, as yielded by the straightforward mathematical result of dividing its high value by near-zero cost to obtain, which last is just the effort to download it and any contribution given.
IHTH
Jim
(Note: I have no relationship whatsoever to SourceForge or its FreeMind project, so no, this is not "comment blog spam", and I receive no benefit from them except many of their excellent free products just like everyone else can.)
Sorry I wasn't more clear, though I still think I was _adequately_ clear. My comment, "Editors, please try harder to improve this, as has been pointed out many times," was directed at the Editors, not any author(s). My goal is to reduce the occurrence of articles that purport to include a market survey (as yours does IMHO) but leave out significant players (as your does). TechRepublic editors often allow this shortcoming in their publications, and many of us readers complain about it often, as it causes us more work (to do our own research to confirm or refute the authors' conclusions) and it reduces our opinion of the value of TechReplublic publications, so in effect we are trying to help TR improve their service, which would in turn benefit all readers, and presumably would also benefit TR in some tangible way, e.g. more advertising revenue due to increased market share.
My post is a specific application to your article of my general belief/principle:
When you go beyond just raving about MindGenius (which would have been just fine, and in line with the title of your article) and begin _implying_ that it is the "best deal", you incur the responsibility to be "fair" (maybe a better word would be "complete", which is the word I chose) and include _all_ the significant contenders, which FreeMind certainly is, again IMHO, and in the opinion of many presumed experts. For example, it has more "Likes" than _all_ the other alternatives _combined_, on http://alternativeto.net/software/mindgenius/, and there are hundreds of similar posts. When cost to obtain software is considered, which is so important to so many small businesses etc. nowadays, it is hard to beat its value-per-cost: It's nearly infinite, as yielded by the straightforward mathematical result of dividing its high value by near-zero cost to obtain, which last is just the effort to download it and any contribution given.
IHTH
Jim
Do you recommend and prefer use a MindGenius to administrate your projects?
Hi -
I use MindGenius to capture ideas, track issues, maintain meeting minutes and do high level functions with a WBS. I then use MS Project for project schedule administration. If you combine both these tools, you have a powerful toolkit for your projects
Andy
I use MindGenius to capture ideas, track issues, maintain meeting minutes and do high level functions with a WBS. I then use MS Project for project schedule administration. If you combine both these tools, you have a powerful toolkit for your projects
Andy
...for a well-presented and valuable post. The mind mapping tools I've tried in the past always left me lukewarm at best. MindGenius looks and sounds like a better mousetrap.
Would like to hear from other members about their experience with MindGenius and mind mapping tools in general.
Would like to hear from other members about their experience with MindGenius and mind mapping tools in general.
Thanks for the kind words! When I first saw MindGenius I thought the same thing about how it was similar to other tools on the market. Then I took a deeper dive at the features and the nuances make it stand head and shoulders above the rest.
The Map Explorer and Category Map generation sold me.
I do have a section on mind mapping on my blog at:
http://www.tacticalprojectmanagement.com/table/mind-mapping-project-management/
Let me know if you have any questions!
Andy
The Map Explorer and Category Map generation sold me.
I do have a section on mind mapping on my blog at:
http://www.tacticalprojectmanagement.com/table/mind-mapping-project-management/
Let me know if you have any questions!
Andy
I've been using Mind Genius for seven years and find it most useful when I quickly want to capture points that are being made in a project meeting. It's quick and easy to learn how to use at this level. Sharing the information is straightforward too such as sending it out as a spreadsheet for people who prefer lists to pictures. However, I've shied away from using it for more sophisticated activities such as project management mainly because the learning curve gets steep quickly and the tool starts to appear 'lumpy' such as ticking all actions as completed in the picture map. That said it is a tool has continuied to improve during my time of using it and I hope it will continue to do so.
For large project management administration, you are correct that any mind mapping tool will make project schedule management difficult. This is why i recommend using the mind map to generate the WBS and high level scope. Export it to MS-Project and refine it.
From a meeting minutes perspective, I create a mind map for each "workstream" I own in the program and maintain notes. The % complete feature is very useful for the follow-up and action items. These actions don't make it into a project schedule but as an action item tracker with meeting minutes, MindGenius is an excellent productivity tool.
Thanks!
Andy
From a meeting minutes perspective, I create a mind map for each "workstream" I own in the program and maintain notes. The % complete feature is very useful for the follow-up and action items. These actions don't make it into a project schedule but as an action item tracker with meeting minutes, MindGenius is an excellent productivity tool.
Thanks!
Andy
Thank you, Dr. Makar for a very insightful brief on the value of mind mapping. I use the Mindjet tool for a lot of advanced PM, program management, and business development activities. I also find it useful when outlining key documents and correspondence. The utility of the mindmap is limited only by the imagination! I chose to pay for the extra features a commerical (vice freeware) tool offered as there are markers, task information features, labeling, and dynamic icon sets that enhance the use of the tool. Invariably, I believe my use of a good suite of tools enhances my consulting performance. Mind Genius has a most impressive set of capabilities and the cost is well worth it.
Thanks again,
Thanks again,
Hi,
I strongly hope someone can help me out with the following!
When I try to save my document in MindGenius Business 4 I receive an error message saying:
"Could not save document. (C:\Users\Ellen\map1.mgmx) A semi colon character was expected"
Does anyone know how to solve this?
Lots of thanks.
Ellen Duke
I strongly hope someone can help me out with the following!
When I try to save my document in MindGenius Business 4 I receive an error message saying:
"Could not save document. (C:\Users\Ellen\map1.mgmx) A semi colon character was expected"
Does anyone know how to solve this?
Lots of thanks.
Ellen Duke
Hi - I work in a company that stopped upgrading MS Project back at 2003 version. I am now using MindGenius after bailing out from Mindjet after their licensing policy changed. I am looking to build a business case for adopting MS Project 2010 [or any newer versions] Can any of you MindGenius Geniuses help me with examples of why operationally using MS Project 2010 is better than 2003 with MindGenius. I know its a big ask but I cannot get hold of project 2010 to try it myself so hoping this is one of those DUH!!! Questions were the obvious is staring me in the face.
- Keyboard Shortcuts:
- Prev
- Next
- Toggle

































