Discussion on:

Message 6 of 31
3 Votes
+ -
DVD vs Instant Watch
I was a subscriber to Netflix for a few years and absolutely loved the service, even forking out the extra few bucks in order to rent Blu-Ray. After the first several months, they announced an increase in price.. which I didn't mind as it was still cheaper than renting the movies from any other rental place and gave me the flexibility I desired. Then they increased again, still I stayed on ship. But when they started putting more investment into instant watch opposed to rentals, including the pricing, I had to bid a farewell. It is a common belief that digital copies and online streaming is THE future for entertainment, and I have to admit, I somewhat agree. The only problem is that it's the FUTURE, the technology just doesn't have the capacity to sustain it yet. When I want to watch a movie, I want the ability to turn it on and go.

I live in Kansas, and I know that the highest possible internet out here isn't the same as on the east or west coast, but with that being said, I have the highest option available to me. Still, when I would queue a movie on instant watch, I'd still have to let the movie buffer for more than a few minutes just to get a consistent quality, and still it wasn't near as crisp of a picture as an up-converted DVD, let alone Blu-Ray quality. I want to enjoy every aspect of a movie, not just watching it. Until bandwidth levels allow for a consistent 1080p or even 720p online stream, DVD/Blu-Ray rentals are going to be priority number one. I may be part of the minority, but I'm sure that there are many who left for a similar reason. Hastings needs to do right by the dedicated consumer and admit his mistake. I'm sure Redbox and Blockbuster Express aren't complaining though happy
Posted by kenjwsu
27th Oct 2011