<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Office solution: Improving Excel's charting defaults ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-350501]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-350501/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-20T19:29:20-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Excel Charts]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-350501-3522671]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Interesting how small changes can make such a difference.In Excel charting, is there an easy way to compare relative performance of two sets of data?  So, each set starts at &quot;zero&quot; and you measure show their relative performance over time?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-350501-3522671]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian005]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:45:07 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

