It would have been nice to elaborate...
... what we should, as a community, consider what 'trolling' means (there isn't even a term to describe that word in my culture) and how important it is to prevent it compared to the risk of removing controversial, but intelligent discourse.
In other words, I'd rather see seemingly offensive, aggravating and baseless ad hominem attacks (I presume that is what you mean by 'trolling'), than see my opinion censored (or worse, my right to post an opinion revoked) because it displeased someone.
Is it really so difficult to ignore the trolls that we must use censorship with the risk of silencing what could be breakthrough ideas in a forum?
