Pointless...........
The reasoning offered in 3 sucks! I am a free-lance consultant and even I don't want to work beyond 5 PM. It's statements like "Technology doesnt adhere to a set schedule" that justify the slave pens run at places like CISCO. During the hirng process the hiring managers at that "corporation" tell you that they will pay you for 40 hours of work but expect you to work 60; like it's the given! "If youre someone who refuses to let your workweek interfere with your personal life well, the writing on the wall is pretty clear". If you _don't_ refuse to let your work week interfere with your personal life, especially if you'e married and have a family then you're staring divorce right in the face! So Mr. Wallen, the writing on the wall is pretty clear to me; You shouldn't be writing at all witohout proper research.
Number 10: "This relates to your work hours. Many IT pros I work with are on call 24/7". Well, their lives suck! And if see that as a justification, then you're aiding and abetting in the creation of Morlocks.
Number 8: Who says you can't climb the corporate ladder in IT? Mr. Wallen, you come across more and more as an amateur, so tell me, ever hard of Steve Jobs?
All the other numbers apply to any individual in any and every industry and if the reasoning behind them is correct then we should all be unemployed.
