Fact - The average annual increase in jobs during Clinton's first term was 2.52%. During his second term it was 2.24%. (BLS)

Context: Clintons first term was highlighted with an economy which was already growing at a 4.2% rate before he even took office. So, should Clinton be given credit for an economy which was growing before he took office? That fact I just mentioned is pertinent to your fact, because, your fact would not have occurred unless the economy was growing, which growth occurred despite Clintons damage to the economy with the largest tax increase in American history.

(Apparently, the system is not allowing me to post the other parts of my comments, and they're being deleted or disallowed immediately. I'll keep trying.)