It is really absurd that so many "IT Pros" have failed to understand why the article was posted and they have posted all these stupid comments.It is wise for one to apply Critical Thinking before they start assuming they have understood what they have read. The word used in the article was ALTERNATIVE and not BETTER ALTERNATIVE. James says they perform the same or similar web functions. Everyone making these stupid comments and insulting JJ should have noted that the alternatives being provided were for a specific group "those security-conscious enough to have
reservations about using google-net". I am very disappointed by all these Irrational comments. People should read and understand before they start posting Irrational comments.