Un-Like - and completely disagree with the judge's ruling.
The party clicked a button labelled with a word that expressed an affirmation of the candidate or his post. It wasn't a smiley face. It wasn't a thumbs up. But even symbolically (thanks to the sign-language poster), there is a whole variety of vernacular that should be considered "freedom of expression" (i.e. emoticons, images of common facial expressions or hand gestures). They are culturally relevant forms of expression. And when a person needs a facilitator for expression - due to a disability that prevents them from communicating in a written or oral form - what then? Is that person's 1st Amendment right revoked?
That judge needs to enter the 21st century.