<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Office 365 adoption increases by 400 percent in Asian SMBs ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-392283]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-392283/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-19T11:43:47-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Reads like advertising. Customers only saved 10% !?!]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-392283-3673888]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[(So they grew by 400% by going from 1 customer to 4 customers... they should give some numbers about adoption rates) My concern is that MS admits to only saving their customers 10% over the cost of local administrators, local servers, software licenses, etc. That's not a compelling reason to go to web based office solutions. Google saves their customers much more than just 10%]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-392283-3673888]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[lkarnis@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:20:43 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

