Discussion on:

Message 13 of 16
3 Votes
+ -
The assumption is wrong.
It's not that we don't get it, much more of we see the potential dangers and don't want it.

That's a big difference between what has been written and what is fact.

Security for a company is bad enough when you're holding 99% of the cards, but when you're only holding 50%? Does it really need any further explanation?
Posted by lastchip
5th Sep