<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on How DBS Bank implements two-factor authentication ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-23T22:01:52-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[I love 2FA]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3703338]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[It's nice to see another company giving users the perfect balance between security and user experience by implementing 2FA which allows us to telesign into our accounts. I know some will claim this make things more complicated, but the slight inconvenience each time you log in is worth the confidence of knowing your info is secure.  I'm hoping that more companies start to offer this awesome functionality. This should be a prerequisite to any system that wants to promote itself as being secure.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3703338]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Tgneg]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:18:10 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Only DBS did these??]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3703185]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[As an IT professional, I don't see how these are different from any major banks in the world. As a bank client, these are bottom line security I would look for before banking in.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3703185]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[zarino_tong@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:59:39 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[DBS is still primitive compared to OCBC and Stanchart]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3703067]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I don't \understand why DBS sends one-time passwords sometimes to our second factor tokens and sometimes to our mobile phone SMS.This makes it very inconvenient for travellers, because it means that they will have to carry both their tokens as well as their mobile phones with them wherever they go.  What about those whose registered mobile does not have roaming facility in a particular country?  They will be completely cut off from using DBS facility too.I strongly suggest that DBS allows the user to choose between tokens and mobile SMS, just like what OCBC and Stanchart do.  So, in this respect DBS is still primitive compared to other banks.  DBS should do away with sending one-time passwords to mobiles for people who travel to a country that does not have roaming facilities for our Singapore SIMcards.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3703067]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[phyongpp]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:37:37 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Why doesn't that bank use  a DIGIPASS ?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3702993]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[With a Digipass (specialized pocket calculator), the customer would not have to wait for an email from its bank before transferring money to a new beneficiary.  European banks for this case ask the client to input additional details directly thru  the digipass machine. Similarly, if the amount to be transferred is over $2000,00 , again as a precaution: the bank asks to key in additional details directly into the digipass. As you can see, no idle time is spent waiting for an email (which may never arrived if sent to the wrong address).]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3702993]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[jcjunne@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:44:30 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Voice as an authentication tool]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3702945]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Recently I have seen voice biometrics gaining  traction, voice will be very difficult to mimic, combine that with 2fa. It however depends on the strength of the biometric system.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3702945]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[diasl]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:25:32 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[..]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3702907]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[The two-way authentication is not new to security industry but don't understant why many international banks are still not able to implement this. Many European banks strictly follow two-way authentication but there are many banks and organizations missing this!]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-394980-3702907]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[TechyBoyz]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

