Discussion on:

109
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
Email Alert
No it isn't, it's just tucked away and hidden better. Now we will refer to "file" and "folder" as Microsoft wishes us to, such as "tile". No, I don't care for Macs and I use Windows PCs, but this is a misconception....
So much is true. But is this any good? What is the reason for this? I personally cannot answer the first question and have no response for the second one. One thing is sure: the first look and feel of Windows 8 is quite different, without any obvious benefits or advantages to justify this difference.
2 Votes
+ -
No question that Microsoft is rewriting the idea. But, and it is a big "but," since it is not friendly to the business community, what happens when they go somewhere else or choose to not embrace the new "idea.?"
Microsoft has just Taken their OS and stripped out all the good things just to make it work on Phones, Tablets and PC. At this rate I'll never move to windows 8. Hope MS changes it direction with 9 As for it being more security... Ha, I've heard that before, and they still hape problems.
Comments like these amaze me, no doubt, you have not used Windows 8 or investigated it at all
Many companies have Office licenses for their employees ... but per the faq, until your company has licensed Office 2013, you're not covered for business use of Office RT.

Not that anyone will pay attention, and MS will no doubt wink at it.

Should also be clear that macros, add-ins, InfoPath forms, and 3rd party apps built on Office won't work with the RT version.
moment you buy the device with the software preloaded you can legally use it whatever way you like. They would NOT win a case in court if a business didn't buy a commercial licence for Office 2013 - anyway, MS maintain the version of Office on the RT is NOT the full one, so why would you want it for business.
just like the iPad and the Android tablet, Win RT can only satisfy a niche market need in today's business world.
Windows 8 is a different animal.
2 Votes
+ -
I think it's time to see if you will stick to windows or check if a linux flavour is more your style. I'll guess we'll see a revival of terminal servers/citrix and other emulators to keep old apps (you know: prrrrogrammmms) running.
I have to wonder if anything will be done. The following was noted in the post:

http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/102-352310

... where I witnessed very interesting conversation. The topic was Windows 8 application design for developers. Lecturer described grid, fonts, margins etc into great detail, and then she went on to menus, navigation, and so on. During this, she was interrupted by somehow irritated question from the public:

"Hey, what about data entry?"

Answer: "Windows 8 apps are not meant for data entry. They are meant to be used anytime, anywhere, in any situation, for information consumption, not production. You know, browsing shopping catalogues, news, and such."

Question: "But what about business applications?"

Answer: "They belong to desktop, not to Windows 8 app store. Business apps deal with tens of thousands of items or more. There is now way Windows 8 app UI could handle this. As a matter of fact, I can't even imagine things like Photoshop running under Win 8."

Q: "B-b-b-but grumble grumble!?"

A: "Consider this. What would you prefer do develop
- a business application only a couple of companies are interested in
- an application for App Store with at least half a billion of potential customers?"

..................

That makes it clear MS see Win 8 as a purely retail consumer use product only, not an enterprise capable one.

I wonder if we'll now see two variants - odd numbers of Windows releases for consumer users and even numbers for enterprise users - - that would make a lot more sense and tie in better with the corporate roll over to a new OS pattern.
The concept of odd numbered OSs for businesses and serious consumers and even numbered OSs for the casual users is excellent. Let the final users decide which OS suits them best.
The main bugbear for me is that in Metro interface, Windows 8 'has no windows'.

It's a pretty fundamental point.
Straight Windows 8 has both the new touch interface and the familiar Windows 7 desktop. Only if you buy the RT only version will you lose the old interface.

So the learning curve is not steep to run Windows 7 apps, yes you have a different looking start menu, but after you are in the desktop it's the same.

For RT and the metro/modern interface, yes there is something to learn, but that is only to swipe in from the edges. The right side for system stuff, the top or bottom for app functions and the left to go back. Sorry, that wasn't that steep either.

Let's face it though the new interface will not be much use to business in the short term so few should be buying RT only tablets right now. It won't replace your desktop and you'll be frustrated by the lack of full functionality - even in the web browser. Fortunately in full Windows 8 all the functionality you know and love is still there.
Or if the benefits of Windows 8 in desktop mode do not appeal then you could just stick with Windows 7. Millions of people still use XP too.
18 Votes
+ -
Top Rated
Use the "Metro" UI for tablets, phones, etc but keep the old windowing system as per Windows 7 INCLUDING THE START BUTTON & MENUS, PLEASE as is on Windows 7 for enterprise and legacy's sake - Simples!
It would be easy to implement as underneath, the system is NT 6.
Trouble is, the goons at Microsoft cannot see this simple solution.
What you may not understand yet is that the Metro interface IS the start menu. They took what was formerly BURIED beneath the start menu and lifted it to be your primary interface. Thats why when you swipe the right side of the screen and press the START icon it takes you to the Metro interface.

If you want quick access to the administrative functions that used to be available on the start menu, you need not look any further than pressing the WINDOWS+X key combination.
1 Vote
+ -
Moderator
But I couldn't reach the monitor.

And why should I be happy that what used to be available at the touch of the Win key now requires that I press the X key in addition? How is moving from one keystroke to two keystrokes "easier"?

Not everybody has a mobile device. Not everybody wants a mobile device. And nobody who works in a text- or data-based environment (and there are many-many of us) is going to try to do actual work on a mobile device...more than once.
0 Votes
+ -
Pro
swipe is not necessary
JJFitz Updated - 4th Nov
to get to the start button, left click in the lower left corner where the start button used to be.
to get to administrator functions, hover on the start screen thumbnail (where the start button used to be) in the lower left corner where the start menu used to be and right click it.

No extra keys required. No swipe required.
-3 Votes
+ -
They did!
333239 29th Oct
Desktop mode in Windows 8 is the old Windowing system. Only the start menu is bigger, what's the big deal?
and it provides NO benefit over the current Win 7 start except on a small touch screen device.
0 Votes
+ -
Ugly?
333239 29th Oct
That's a different problem. If you don't like the colour you can change it, and the pattern. The desktop does have some advantages over Win7, the whole thing is smaller and quicker to install and it starts a lot faster than Win 7 too. There are many small improvements like the copy files dialog, better parental controls, etc. For me it's worth the price of an upgrade even if I never used the Modern UI stuff.
of a finger nail without blowing out the resolution to something ridiculous - not even the local Microsoft support people can answer that one and have it open that way each time.

My client has given up and had the trial copy removed from his system. I'm glad I use Zorin OS Linux at home, so I don't have to put up with Win 8, and I get faster operation with better features.
I put Zorin on a VM (VirtualBox) and encountered a lot of bugs right off the start.
Things like, only the default "Theme" works, switch to any other and odd boxes and stuff appear.
The site shows more options for the desktop switcher, but you only get XP and Windows 7.

I locked it up repeatedly trying to install the VB6 runtimes into Wine.

Also other strange stuff like taskbar items not showing up, and I couldn't find the taskill program so I couldn't figure out how to kill a non responsive program (wine program).


I only suspect the VM software cause when I tried the latest Mint, it wouldn't even show my mouse on screen, I had to use keyboard shortcuts.
Keyboard Shortcuts:
Prev
Next
Toggle
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the TechRepublic Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.