Comment rather than argument
from the comment "interesting"
It was clear that the mention of the word "evolution" caused ambiguity in the piece because it was used to describe something that cannot evolve (automatic (please note the difference between automatic and automated) it has to BE changed, in the case of computer viruses by human hand, or by built in morphological code(automated), built in by human hand. Hence no evolution for computer viruses.
The world evolution has to ALWAYS be clearly defined when used or be replaced with a more appropriate word.
In school they taught you if you are going to use an abbreviation multiple times you write it out the first time and put the abbreviation in brackets and then later on use the abbreviation:
The Central Processing Unit (CPU) is at the???. CPU??????.. CPU???.
So with evolution simply because the word has SO MANY MEANINGS
PS. I am not shouting, I just wanted to put some emphasis on a few word
