Unfortunately, in the official history there are many pro-Chinese falsifications about the "wild nomads", "incredible cruelty of nomadic mongol-tatar conquerors", and about "a war between the Tatars and Genghis Khan etc.
Well, perhaps you know, that a famous Tatar historian-scientist D. Iskhakov wrote in 2000: the real history of Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet.
However, recently was published a book by Galy Yenikeyev (Galy Rashid uly Yenikey) about the unwritten (hidden) real history of Tatars.
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book, and well-grounded rebuttal of the chinese-persian myths about "incredible cruelty of nomadic mongol-tatar conquerors", and about "a war between the Tatars and Genghis Khan etc.
This book presents a new, or rather "well-forgotten old" information about the true history of the medieval Tatars the native nation of Genghis-Khan.
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Genghis Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. Notes to the portrait from the book say: "...In the ancient Tatar historical source About the clan of Genghis-Khan the author gives the words of the mother of Genghis-Khan: My son Genghis looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and goes on a white horse [34, p. 14].
As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar story. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Genghis-Khan...".
This e-book you can easily find in the Internet, on Smashwords company website: http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/175211
Therefore, primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names "Mongol" and "Tatar" (Tartar") in the medieval Eurasia:
the name "Mongol" until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While the name "Tatar" was the name of the native ethnos (nation) of Genghis Khan ??? , ???Genghis Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the "Mongolian???" (Russian academic-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This is also confirmed by many other little known facts.
So in fact Genghis Khan was a Tatar and a great leader of the all Turkic peoples. But with time many of his descendants and tribesmen became spiritually disabled and forgot him and his invaluable doctrine and covenants... Tatars of Genghis Khan -medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite the politicians of the tsars Romanovs and Bolsheviks dictators had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About it and about many other things from the true history of Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, which was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the in the above-mentioned book "Forgotten Heritage of Tatars" (by Galy Yenikeyev).
Keep Up with TechRepublic