Is the writer Retarded? I will just give one example and not waste my time.
Ash shoving down a magazine down Ripley throat. That was NOT AI...It was the Writer of the movie..DUH!!
Each and every movie you mentioned is a figment of the writers imagination who obviously is NOT a scientist.
I said one example but while I am at it let me talk about Terminator, it has big plot holes. It just does not make sense. People went to the special effects at that time. It was not supposed to "predict" what technology would do to us.
If this article supposed to be a joke(a bad one) then well its fine. I don't understand how could Techrepublic find this worthy of publishing.
Either tech republic is running out of Ideas of the author is..(or the author is really failing and trying to give a "twist" and/or come up with some thing "unique).
The only movie that had a logical take over was I, Robot, it had a very simple logic. The system was programmed to protect the earth and entire Mankind so it took over.
The only thing that did not make sense is this "self aware" ********. The emotions etc. There is not way to explain it logically you have to just accept it.
Now just "accepting" some ******** so that a movie can be made(or watched) used as a premise for "demonizing" Siri. which is far from AI. Is ridiculous.
