Reply to Message
you made my point...
I agree, massive thanks to the samba team! Jack should definitely have mentioned the difference is Samba 4. THAT has been a long time in the making, sheesh, "fedora" was still "red hat" when the first samba 4 packages started showing up in testing, wasn't it?
In any event, I remember trying proto-samba 4 as far back as 2005 with Mandriva 10.2
Credit where credit is due. The biggest story of all here is definitely making the jump to samba 4 as the default. Way to go fedora team!
In any event, I remember trying proto-samba 4 as far back as 2005 with Mandriva 10.2
Credit where credit is due. The biggest story of all here is definitely making the jump to samba 4 as the default. Way to go fedora team!
Posted by pgit
15th Jan
