Discussion on:

1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
Email Alert
If I had virtualized my storage to make it uber-HA, like two EMC or IBM arrays behind a VPLEX (local) or SVC appliance so that even if one of the arrays quit serving storage my clients would not notice...

Would I prefer to use SQL Server 2012 they way I had in the past, or use the AlwaysOn availability groups and connect directly to each of the storage arrays (not use the VPLEX or SVC)?

Kind of a question between using the native functionality in SQL 2012 versus licensing storage space on a virtualization appliance.
Keyboard Shortcuts:
Prev
Next
Toggle
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the TechRepublic Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.