Sorry, it lost me at the title and first sentence.
"It should come as no surprise that the Communist Party USA is on board with President Obamas plan to attack Americans right to keep and bear arms as a means to 'end gun violence.'"
I disagree with the article's title of 'gun grab', and I disagree that the proposed changes to gun regulations are an 'attack on rights to keep and bear arms'. These phrases tell me the article is not going to be impartial.
I don't buy into the 'slippery slope' theory that any regulation automatically leads to elimination. We had an ban on so-called assault weapons for a decade; it didn't lead to the elimination of other types of weapons.
I see nothing wrong with closing the 'gun show loophole'. Travelling retailers should be required to comply with the same laws as brick-and-mortar retailers.
I don't see anything wrong with state or national databases tracking serial numbers. We do the same with automobile VINs; that's hadn't led to government confiscation of cars, but does make it harder to sell stolen ones, return recovered stolen property to its owner, and identify vehicles used in crimes.
If that makes me a communist, fine with me. I wasn't aware that agreeing with someone on one principle automatically meant I agreed with them on all principles, but so be it, comrade. I guess I'm a lesbian too.
