Not another one - please
Win2K or NT5 as it was initially, was the most beta tested, most reworked, most tweaked OS that Redmond ever put out. Steve Ballmer said that the reason they delayed the release of Win2K was that they wanted to get it right the first time. I thinkthey did a decent job with it. I am in the process of a Win2K roll-out and am not even interested in looking at yet another OS. If they got it right the first time (with Win2K) what reason - other than a money grab - is there to replace that OS inthe following calendar year. Gimme a break already.