<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Use Cacls.exe to view and manage Windows ACLs ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-20T21:29:14-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[subinacl]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-2560276]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I know this is an old old post, but I had to share this.Came upon an xp home machine, that nothing else worked, fixing it.I ran the subinacl (in regular mode), rebooted, and everything was perfect.I know it is said it doesn't work on XP but I figured what did I have to lose? It saved gutted it out and reinstalling everything, including the OS.  It took about 30 min.tops.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-2560276]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[golferguy1@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 05:57:20 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Subinacl]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-737173]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I prefer subinacle to cacls.We have a SFU 3 NFS server.Subinacl lets me set the owner and primary posix group as well as change the acls.I think I got it from the 2000 resource kit.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-737173]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[stevenberkholz]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:09:12 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Very expensive]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-737171]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I fell in love with security explorer, but it is too expensive for me.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-737171]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[stevenberkholz]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:06:33 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Take ownership]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-737151]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[If you are completely locked out, the Administrator can always take ownership and change permissions. System restore is a solution for more critical situations.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-737151]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodge]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:09:07 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Good advice.]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-736774]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I once managed to change the permissions on a folder (using cacle but leaving out /E) so that *no one* (not even Administrator) had the right to read or *change permissions* on the folder! Thank God for system restore.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-736774]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[nroy@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 03:45:14 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Security Explorer]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-597354]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Try Security Explorer - by Small Wonders Software - www.smallwonders.com - It can backup and restore permissions and makes all this permissions stuff easier than CACLS!Ben]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-597354]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[thomasb0104@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:59:31 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[more cacls help]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-597106]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I use cacls in scripts all the time. I bought the book &quot;windows nt shell scripting&quot; and it has an advanced script in it using cacls. The book is worth it's weight in gold, but may be obsolete, I haven't bothered using other scripting techniques (vbscript, jscript, etc.)lee randolph, ccnp, etc...]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-597106]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[lee@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:31:11 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Backup permissions]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-594713]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[If you have a long tree, like I did once, you can use cacls that prints all the ACL's to the screen.  Just redirect it to a file.  Then you can cut and paste, if necessary, to rebuild your permissions.  This saved me BIG time once before.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-594713]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[bruce.ellefritz@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 03:23:34 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Backup permissions??]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-594642]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[What if I want to save or backup the existing permissions on a particular hierarchy of folders to be restored later as needed? (not backup of the actual data... just the security on the folders)Could this be done with cacls or xcacls?? How??]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-594642]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[frubio@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 02:13:15 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Always verify before you hit enter]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-594424]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[As you found out Cacl's is a very powerful tool. I always check twice before I run my calc commands. The /e parameter is the one that allows you to edit the ACL instead of replacing it. Imagine running a cacl /g /t on the root directory without adding the /e parameter. Happy computing.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-594424]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[lewey04@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:45:40 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Be Careful is right]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-592180]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I used CACLS with the /G switch to add a user to an ACL. Neither your article or my book &quot;Windows 2000 Administration in a nutshell&quot; mention that if you use /G switch, it will overwrite rather than edit the ACL.  Be Careful!  I had no idea it would wipe out every user and group in the ACL.  Luckily I had taken a screen shot of the ACL prior to running CACLS.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/11-98559-592180]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[travisr@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:26:37 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

