Discussion on:

1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
Email Alert
'tho short, I felt these comments touched on an issue that will become more serious as regulated industry becomes more involved in electronic records / electronic signatures. I consult to FDA -regulated industries, primarily medical device / pharma. This industry is under 21 CFR Part 11 which requires that software for ER / ES be validated, which costs $1000's. Any subsequent change to that validated sw requires documented review and verification, if not revalidation. Automated updates / patches by the sw vendor, w/o such a documented review by the user, is a violation of the regs. I believe the issues in finance and legal fields are similar. Especially since the regs require cert'n that an ES carries the same legal weight as a hand signature. Everybody using such ES' should be assured that the sw is validated and that subsequent 'updates' haven't compromised that validation, date / time stamped audit trails, et al.
Keyboard Shortcuts:
Prev
Next
Toggle
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the TechRepublic Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.