Discussion on:

6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
Email Alert
0 Votes
+ -
The article says that 802.11g clients drop to 802.11b mode and perfornance when 802.11b clients are present. Not exactly. Rather the 802.11g client will send either a 802.11b CTS to Self or RTS/CTS prior to each 802.11g frame it sends. These CTS or RTS/CTS frames tell the 802.11b clients that a 802.11g client has something to send, and that they should hold off any transmissions for a amount of time to allow the 802.11g to send without impacting it.

A reduction in performance of the 802.11g client is experienced due to the overhead of having to send these additional CTS and/or RTS frames - but the 802.11g client does not revert fully to 802.11b mode, and the performance impact varies with frame sizes, distance, etc. - typically experiencing a 10-40% reduction in throughput is seen for the 802.11g client in a 802.11b mixed environment.
0 Votes
+ -
I see 20+ mbps 11g devices droping to 3 mbps along with a 3 mbps 11b device. These are hard numbers and experiments on very detailed reports I've seen from Tomsnetworking.
0 Votes
+ -
I have not reviewed Tom's data, rather my experiences from working with many installations. YMMV (your miliage may vary).

Nevertheless, the 802.11g protection mechanisms do cause the 802.11g client to use CTS to Self and RTS/CTS. With the variences of the size of the data payload of the frame being protected, the performance impact will vary (large frames, less impact).
0 Votes
+ -
the 4 channel model is fine, unless there are 3 channel model access points also in the visinity. Looks at the diagrams to see the overlap and problem.

Hotels are expiecing this issue, in that they installed with a 4 channel model - and now travelers are bringing in 'portable' or 'pocket' access points and plugging them in. These 'portable' access points are typically defaults to a 3 channel model channel.
0 Votes
+ -
The 2.4 GHz range is a deadend. Always go with a dualband 802.11 a/b/g solution. The miniPCI adapters are only $30 for an Intel board.
Agreed, 5 GHz is a great way to go. I always recommend it myself. However, the large number of 2.4 GHz devices is going to be with us for some time...
Keyboard Shortcuts:
Prev
Next
Toggle
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the TechRepublic Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.