<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.techrepublic.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Establish a configuration control board ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-23T14:05:15-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[CCB and Security]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-2432633]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Security is an important issue as it relates to change management, however, the CCB is always aware of the security. In my experience we handle the security at a lower level. The CCB is a review board and should be provided with general information. Security should be built into your change process. During your process you should have an authorization matrix identifying segrgated duties. You should have separate design, test, and quality environments with each person having assigned access rights. This should alleviate security issues at the CCB level. Anyone on the CCB board should be privy to the information in the change request without getting into all the details that may be confidential.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-2432633]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[jamcshell@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:35:07 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1691509]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[yes, me.no hardware or software can be installed except by me.no data transmitted that contins sensitive data except by me.( gotta love having total control huh  )actually one person organisation. :-D]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1691509]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaqui]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:38:35 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[What about ISO]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690661]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Yes, I understand. We follow &amp; apply ITIL &amp; Six Sigma (I myself an Certified in both) throughoutInformation Technology processes...But I was wondering if anyone out there was using an ISO standard in OPERATIONS? If so, which one(s)?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690661]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[dafe2]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:01:31 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[applying standards]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690284]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Applying standards such as ITIL &amp; Six Sigma as broadly as possible increase the design functionality of your divisions and network. Computerized environments run on standards and efficiency through implementation, increases as standards are applied.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690284]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Mullins]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 03:47:59 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[applying standards]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690283]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Applying standards such as ITIL &amp; Six Sigma as broadly as possible increase the design functionality of your divisions and network. Computerized environments run on standards and efficiency through implementation, increases as standards are applied.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690283]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Mullins]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 03:47:53 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[We use a Change Advisory Board]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690109]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[We use the following frameworks &amp; principles within &amp; arround all our IT processes:ITIL, MOF and Six SigmaNo it's not heaven, but at least we know where to look when things go wrong.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690109]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[dafe2]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:25:03 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[CM .........  can't go wrong]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690069]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Glad to meet another that understands the relevance of ITIL &amp; Six Sigma methodologies...............and it's importance &amp; relevance in our industry. Currently, we're reviewing our Change Advisory Board, Service Desk and the CMDB. Not a good month. :-}Question though:Do (you) also use MOF as well? We apply ISO to programmers....do you apply this to other areas? If so which one(s)?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1690069]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[dafe2]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 07:42:36 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[ISO and ITIL and Six Sigma]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1689351]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[All of those process management philosophies detail the need for change control in an environment. Considering the way most change is handled in organizations, you would think the feudal system had never been abolished...]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1689351]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[BFilmFan]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 04:12:30 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Security ans Service Pack updating]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1689349]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[How can anyone determine whether a network or system is &quot;vulnerable to the condition that generated the service pack or update&quot; without testing the service pack or update? If security is that important, then it's my opinion that an informed decision can not be made without testing.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1689349]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[pdirico@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 04:09:57 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Establish a configuration control board]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1688891]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Has your organization established a configuration control board (CCB) or something like it? If so, how does security fit into your CCB process? If not, how valuable do you think a CCB would be for your company? Share your comments about the uses of a configuration control board, as discussed in the Dec. 17 Security Solutions newsletter.If you haven't subscribed to our free Security Solutions newsletter, sign up today! Click this link to subscribe automatically:http://nl.com.com/MiniFormHandler?brand=techrepublic&amp;list_id=e036]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.techrepublic.com/forum/discussions/4-165173-1688891]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[debate@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:12:43 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

