It was very annoying
Here's me an open source proponent who wants to show that my argument is correct.
What do we get to choose from in 'serious' studies of the situation though?
We are right by Microsoft or we are right be Open Source.
Say what you like about the closed source crowd they aren't going to be convinced by this sort of superficiality, anymore than I am by MS FUD.
This was just a waste of phosphenes
While we have so many intangibles in the equation, proponents of either methodology will always be able to 'prove' they are right and we are wrong or vice versa, so why don't we look at the grey fuzzy areas and try for a bit of differentiation.
