- Follow via:
- RSS
- Email Alert
Question
0
Votes
Should I jump from XP to Windows 8?
I'm a web designer/creative/business user ready buy a new computer to replace my current XP PC. Since the Windows 8 release is approaching, I am thinking about jumping straight to 8. Most of the software I run (MS Office, Adobe Creative Suite, Quickbooks, etc.) is the latest version. So I would use my current software on the new computer. What problems could I run into if I skip Win 7 and go right to 8?
Updated - 5th Jun 2012
Answers (16)
-6
Posted by databaseben
| Below your threshold
| Read Anyway
6
Votes
Well right now Microsoft is offering
Buy a 7 System and get a free upgrade to 8. As I'm not involved in this offer I have no idea what it actually covers so you could buy a 7 Ultimate and end up with a 8 Home Basic.
Col
Col
4th Jun 2012
Replies
It'll end up being the same (or equivalent) edition just like it was for Vista. For example, you could not upgrade a Vista Ultimate machine to anything but 7 Ultimate.
Bruce Epper
5th Jun 2012
+1
Even if you don't like W8, you can always go back or downgrade to W7. Same as what they did with W7/Vista->XP
Even if you don't like W8, you can always go back or downgrade to W7. Same as what they did with W7/Vista->XP
zander.opperman
6th Jun 2012
The upgrade to Windows 8 is not free this time around. They are going to charge an extra $15 for an upgrade to Windows 8 Pro which will make it possible for you to purchase the Windows Media pack - no Windows Media Player in Windows 8.
golddust
8th Jun 2012
6
Votes
XP > W7 = Good Move
If it were me, I would buy a new system (desktop/laptop) with W7 OS installed. W7 is a very solid workhorse OS and will be supported for many years! You then have to decide if you want the 32 bit or 64 bit W7 OS. Of course if you want to take advantage of all the 64 bit OS goodness with more available memory etc. you will also have to upgrade your applications software to 64 bit versions to take full advantage or just go with the 32 bit W7 OS and keep your present app software. I tried the W8 Consumer Preview and did not like it for a non-touch based system. On the other hand, as mentioned earlier, Microsoft has a special deal going on where you can buy a W7 system now and later have the option to switch (notice I did not say upgrade) to W8 if you are so inclined. I think W8 is going to be very nice OS for new tablet hardware, but not on "my desktop" from my experience using W8 CP. Perhaps with a W9 release in a couple of years the intended convergence of the desktop/notebook/tablet/phone via the Metro UI will happen as it is even more refined and supported. I just don't see any need to displace W7 on a mouse driven desktop/laptop PC via W8. I think your productivity would suffer using W8's touch centric OS with mouse driven hdw and tiled metro interface. Not having a touch monitor seems to inhibit easy swipe scrolling via W8. I find it quicker to navigate via the W7 start menu Vs W8 tiles & search method. Plus, if you go multi-monitor W7 offers a much better experience using multiple windows with possibility for several open applications to view and work amongst. W8's multi-monitor support seemed almost non-existent, at least with W8 CP. These are just my opinions, YMMV.
4th Jun 2012
Replies
"if you want to take advantage of all the 64 bit OS goodness with more available memory etc. you will also have to upgrade your applications software to 64 bit versions to take full advantage or just go with the 32 bit W7 OS and keep your present app software"
You make it sound like the 64-bit OS cannot run her current 32-bit apps which is patently false. Consider that Office 2007 does not have a 64-bit version, yet I am running O2K7 on my 64-bit Win7 machine right now. The browser I am using at this very moment is the 32-bit version of IE (which comes with the OS). You need to be more careful with either your wording or your research.
You make it sound like the 64-bit OS cannot run her current 32-bit apps which is patently false. Consider that Office 2007 does not have a 64-bit version, yet I am running O2K7 on my 64-bit Win7 machine right now. The browser I am using at this very moment is the 32-bit version of IE (which comes with the OS). You need to be more careful with either your wording or your research.
Bruce Epper
5th Jun 2012
@ultimatloozer - I certainly didn't mean to imply that you can only run 64 bits apps with 64 bit OS. That is why I phrased it as: "Of course if you want to take advantage of all the 64 bit OS goodness with more available memory etc. you will also have to upgrade your applications software to 64 bit versions to take full advantage". Key words being to "...take full advantage...". I guess I could have made it clearer by saying "...you should upgrade..."
On the other hand, I don't know why anyone would suggest purchasing a 64 bit OS to run 32 bit apps. That's like buying an aircraft carrier and flying Piper Cubs off of it. Unless she plans to later update those applications to 64 bit or begin a forward migration to 64 bit apps suggesting a 64 bit OS would seem like overkill for her unless she needs the extra memory capacity.
On the other hand, I don't know why anyone would suggest purchasing a 64 bit OS to run 32 bit apps. That's like buying an aircraft carrier and flying Piper Cubs off of it. Unless she plans to later update those applications to 64 bit or begin a forward migration to 64 bit apps suggesting a 64 bit OS would seem like overkill for her unless she needs the extra memory capacity.
DataPoint1976
5th Jun 2012
If all your apps are 32 bit there can still be a great advantage in running a 64 OS if you're using 64 bit hardware as you then get the full advantage of the hardware as the OS will utilise the hardware for an improved performance of the 32 bit apps. It's been a few years since I've seen anyone sell 32 bit hardware as new, so why not run a 64 bit OS to best use the hardware!
I don't know if you were around at the time, bit Windows 3 was designed for working on 16 bit hardware, but 32 bit hardware was soon fairly common. A special patch came out to convert your 16 bit Windows 3 to be a 32 bit Windows 3, even though the apps were still all 16 bit - what the conversion did was allow the OS to use the full 16 bit capability of the hardware and the apps all ran faster better, especially when you were running more than one app at the time.
I don't know if you were around at the time, bit Windows 3 was designed for working on 16 bit hardware, but 32 bit hardware was soon fairly common. A special patch came out to convert your 16 bit Windows 3 to be a 32 bit Windows 3, even though the apps were still all 16 bit - what the conversion did was allow the OS to use the full 16 bit capability of the hardware and the apps all ran faster better, especially when you were running more than one app at the time.
Deadly Ernest
6th Jun 2012
I stopped reading at "have to upgrade your applications software to 64 bit...
Look further down on the thread and let me tell you why, for most people in your situation, it is entirely advantageous to upgrade to Windows 7 from an operating system that's been out over a decade, and I will give you cold hard facts, not vague and incorrect concepts.
Look further down on the thread and let me tell you why, for most people in your situation, it is entirely advantageous to upgrade to Windows 7 from an operating system that's been out over a decade, and I will give you cold hard facts, not vague and incorrect concepts.
zazimi
8th Jun 2012
Zazimi,
It may or may not be advantageous to upgrade from an older Microsoft Windows version as there's a lot more to it than just how great the latest version is or supposed to be. The situation for a business is a lot different for an individual. I know people who refuse to dump their XP at this point in time because they can NOT afford to buy replacement peripherals they use a lot - printer, scanner, slide and film scanner and the like. This is because the gear works perfectly with XP but does NOT work with Win 7. One person can't switch as they use a special piece of hardware and software that works with their throat microphone to allow them to use their VOIP phone service - neither works with Win 7.
The peripheral hardware compatibility issue and cost is often overlooked by people until AFTER they get the new fancy computer and they get upset when their existing gear doesn't work with the new one.
It may or may not be advantageous to upgrade from an older Microsoft Windows version as there's a lot more to it than just how great the latest version is or supposed to be. The situation for a business is a lot different for an individual. I know people who refuse to dump their XP at this point in time because they can NOT afford to buy replacement peripherals they use a lot - printer, scanner, slide and film scanner and the like. This is because the gear works perfectly with XP but does NOT work with Win 7. One person can't switch as they use a special piece of hardware and software that works with their throat microphone to allow them to use their VOIP phone service - neither works with Win 7.
The peripheral hardware compatibility issue and cost is often overlooked by people until AFTER they get the new fancy computer and they get upset when their existing gear doesn't work with the new one.
Deadly Ernest
8th Jun 2012
You do really have to consider your existing peripherals when deciding whether to go with a 32 bit or 64 bit OS and whether you might need to buy new periperals if there are not 64 bit drivers available. Printers/scanners are notoriously problematic.
From Microsoft:
If I'm running a 64-bit version of Windows, do I need 64-bit drivers for my devices?
Yes. All hardware devices need 64-bit drivers to work on a 64-bit version of Windows. Drivers designed for 32-bit versions of Windows don't work on computers running 64-bit versions of Windows.
In addition, you should read this post in the Windows 7 forum regarding 32 bit vs 64 bit W7 OS decision:
http://www.w7forums.com/windows-7-64-bit-vs-32-bit-t484.html
From Microsoft:
If I'm running a 64-bit version of Windows, do I need 64-bit drivers for my devices?
Yes. All hardware devices need 64-bit drivers to work on a 64-bit version of Windows. Drivers designed for 32-bit versions of Windows don't work on computers running 64-bit versions of Windows.
In addition, you should read this post in the Windows 7 forum regarding 32 bit vs 64 bit W7 OS decision:
http://www.w7forums.com/windows-7-64-bit-vs-32-bit-t484.html
DataPoint1976
8th Jun 2012
Datapoint,
The concerns re current drivers for hardware are real, but not that big an issue IF the hardware was originally designed to use the Industry Standard Command Set and not a specific Microsoft Windows Command Set. If built to use a Windows Command Set out of the box then it needs drivers for anything except that version of Windows, if built to the Industry Standard Commands then it needs drivers for use in any version of Windows.
I have a colour laser printer that I bought in 1996 and was built to use the Industry Standard Command Set, it plugs in and works wonderfully with my current 64 bit Linux operating system - Zorin OS 5; 16 years old and still going strong. This just shows how important it is to check out on the out of the box compatibility of all your hardware
The concerns re current drivers for hardware are real, but not that big an issue IF the hardware was originally designed to use the Industry Standard Command Set and not a specific Microsoft Windows Command Set. If built to use a Windows Command Set out of the box then it needs drivers for anything except that version of Windows, if built to the Industry Standard Commands then it needs drivers for use in any version of Windows.
I have a colour laser printer that I bought in 1996 and was built to use the Industry Standard Command Set, it plugs in and works wonderfully with my current 64 bit Linux operating system - Zorin OS 5; 16 years old and still going strong. This just shows how important it is to check out on the out of the box compatibility of all your hardware
Deadly Ernest
8th Jun 2012
One must consider the fact that the new pc may not have drivers for xp, for its internal components. It works both ways.
zazimi
11th Jun 2012
zazimi,
That's the point hardware built to the Industry Standards doesn't care what OS is installed as long as the OS is designed to the Industry Standards as well. The pity is that Windows isn't designed to the Industry Standards and they get some of the hardware manufacturers to design to the CURRENT Windows standard; that's what causes most of the driver issues. That and the fact Windows does not load their hardware command drivers for anything but the last couple of levels in their Current version of Windows.
That's the point hardware built to the Industry Standards doesn't care what OS is installed as long as the OS is designed to the Industry Standards as well. The pity is that Windows isn't designed to the Industry Standards and they get some of the hardware manufacturers to design to the CURRENT Windows standard; that's what causes most of the driver issues. That and the fact Windows does not load their hardware command drivers for anything but the last couple of levels in their Current version of Windows.
Deadly Ernest
12th Jun 2012
3
Votes
Clarification of original question
This is some great advice. Thanks. Just to clarify my original question, when I said I'm preparing to "upgrade my Win XP computer," I meant that I will be buying a new computer. I will look into this Win 7 offer from Microsoft. Sounds like that could be a great option for me.
5th Jun 2012
Replies
"upgrade my Win XP computer," definitely means you are looking to upgrade THAT computer. Should have said move up to a Windows 7 (or 8) computer.
golddust
8th Jun 2012
2
Votes
Go for it.
Buy a new computer wi7 and the free 8 upgrade. BEFORE shutting down your old computer, recover any product keys from your old software. Adobe has a tool that uninstall the license key so you can reuse it. Belarc Advisor http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html can tell you what you have loaded. Make sure you have an install path for loading you current programs onto your new computer. If you go 64 bit, you may want to go with the 64 bit of your applications to take better advantage of the chip. Belarc will also list out any free programs you have loaded. You will want them too. Make sure to back everything up to transfer to the new computer.
5th Jun 2012
4
Votes
Go with Win 7
Just my opinion but go with Win 7 and 64 bit if possible. I doubt you will be disappointed. Approach Win 8 with caution. I just see no reason to use it on a non-tablet device.
5th Jun 2012
1
Vote
Should I jump from XP to Windows 8?
agreed with sneymeyer. better option is to go with Win 7 64 bit.
system should have minimum 4 GB RAM
system should have minimum 4 GB RAM
5th Jun 2012
0
Votes
XP > 7
I am ready for win 7 PC but prefer windows xp
6th Jun 2012
0
Votes
Speed, simplicity, an advantage of applications
Speed, simplicity, an advantage of applications
6th Jun 2012
0
Votes
Are you getting a system with a touch screen?
Windows 8 is designed and optimised for use with a touch screen and is has huge difference in the way the Graphics User Interface looks, feels, and works you need to be aware of that. If what you're thinking of getting is a touch screen tablet or you use a touch screen tablet or smart phone a lot, then it won't be much of a change to go to Windows 8, if you don't use such a system a lot, get prepared for a case of culture shock.
However, don't forget that there are other options to going for the latest Microsoft offering as well, one of them may be better suited for you, that will depend on what you see as your mission critical software. Also, not all software that runs on Win XP will run on Win 8 or even Win 7, you should check that out first as well.
However, don't forget that there are other options to going for the latest Microsoft offering as well, one of them may be better suited for you, that will depend on what you see as your mission critical software. Also, not all software that runs on Win XP will run on Win 8 or even Win 7, you should check that out first as well.
Updated - 6th Jun 2012
0
Votes
If going to Win 7, get the Enterprise version
I've had to help several people with their Win 7 system and have found the Win 7 Enterprise version as the easiest to use and the most useful with regards to capabilities.
6th Jun 2012
0
Votes
What is this Enterprise you speak of?
(and why am I getting a 404 trying to reply to Deadly Ernest?)
Win 7 has Home Basic, Professional, and Ultimate. The major (maybe only) difference between Pro and Ultimate is BitLocker encryption baked in. Of course, that may matter. Then again, I got Ultimate, and have never used BitLocker (my laziness overpowers my paranoia.)
I've got Pro at work, and it's fine. Home Basic is a little too stripped-down for me. On that note, though, you'll likely need a PC from a business line to get Pro or Ultimate. Not a bad idea anyway, if you're going with one of the major OEMs - their home machines are crap, quite frankly.
Another option is to order the machine without Windows - whether it be FreeDOS (as Dell does now), Linux (not likely), or nothing. Then buy a retail (or cheaper system builder/OEM) license. Major bonus there is, no wasting an hour uninstalling all the crapware the machine will be loaded down with if you get Windows pre-installed. A clean install of Win7 on fresh hardware is a beautiful thing.
As to the upgrade - tread lightly. I took 8 for a test drive (granted, it was the Developers' Preview) and hated it. I like my task bar, I like my start button, I don't mind chrome on my browser, and I don't need the Ribbon on Explorer. However, it has been announced that there will apparently only be two versions of Win8 - Home and Pro. The upgrade from 8 Home to 8 Pro (needed if you want Media Center) will be $15 - a damn sight better than they've handled upgrades in the past, imo.
But, I highly recommend getting a Win7 machine - I resisted for over a year, as I'd spent a lot of time tweaking XP to be just the way I liked it. A year later, I hate working on XP machines. 7 is, to me, by far the best OS MS has ever released. They seem to alternate by version - 98 good, ME terrible, XP good, Vista terrible, 7 best ever...see where this is going?
Win 7 has Home Basic, Professional, and Ultimate. The major (maybe only) difference between Pro and Ultimate is BitLocker encryption baked in. Of course, that may matter. Then again, I got Ultimate, and have never used BitLocker (my laziness overpowers my paranoia.)
I've got Pro at work, and it's fine. Home Basic is a little too stripped-down for me. On that note, though, you'll likely need a PC from a business line to get Pro or Ultimate. Not a bad idea anyway, if you're going with one of the major OEMs - their home machines are crap, quite frankly.
Another option is to order the machine without Windows - whether it be FreeDOS (as Dell does now), Linux (not likely), or nothing. Then buy a retail (or cheaper system builder/OEM) license. Major bonus there is, no wasting an hour uninstalling all the crapware the machine will be loaded down with if you get Windows pre-installed. A clean install of Win7 on fresh hardware is a beautiful thing.
As to the upgrade - tread lightly. I took 8 for a test drive (granted, it was the Developers' Preview) and hated it. I like my task bar, I like my start button, I don't mind chrome on my browser, and I don't need the Ribbon on Explorer. However, it has been announced that there will apparently only be two versions of Win8 - Home and Pro. The upgrade from 8 Home to 8 Pro (needed if you want Media Center) will be $15 - a damn sight better than they've handled upgrades in the past, imo.
But, I highly recommend getting a Win7 machine - I resisted for over a year, as I'd spent a lot of time tweaking XP to be just the way I liked it. A year later, I hate working on XP machines. 7 is, to me, by far the best OS MS has ever released. They seem to alternate by version - 98 good, ME terrible, XP good, Vista terrible, 7 best ever...see where this is going?
6th Jun 2012
Replies
According to the wiki article there is next to no difference between Win 7 Enterprise and Win 7 Ultimate except Win 7 Enterprise is not supposed to be available as a retail option , yet my son downloads it from the Microsoft web site and it's on the new systems my church just sent us for the Family History Centre.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_Enterprise
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_Enterprise
Deadly Ernest
7th Jun 2012
The Enterprise version is distributed by Microsoft to those businesses that have purchases Software Assurance for volume licensing. A church may have such licensing, but I don't see an individual purchasing a volume licensing plan. The son who downloads it from the Microsoft web site might have access from his workplace and by downloading and installing it on personal home PCs is probably violating his company's licensing agreement.
shaunad@...
7th Jun 2012
You neglected to mention Home Premium. Home Basic or Starter is primarily used on Netbooks. Home Premium is what you will usually find on laptop and desktops geared toward home users. Win 7 Professional is the minimum version required if your in a network with a Domain Controller. Home versions will not join a domain, so will not work with Active Directory, Group Policy, etc. so should not be used for anyhing more then a personal or home office setting. The Pro version also has access to the Security properties of all the various parts of the system without having to restart in Safe Mode, making it easier to troubleshoot and fix.
Personally I run Win7 Home Premium x64 on my personal laptop and I am very pleased with it. I still run XP Pro on my personal desktop.
Personally I run Win7 Home Premium x64 on my personal laptop and I am very pleased with it. I still run XP Pro on my personal desktop.
khiatt@...
7th Jun 2012
Shaunad,
My son downloads Win 7 Enterprise off the MS site here at home and runs it on his PC. He doesn't work at all as he has a mental disability that affects his ability to interact with people he doesn't know so he has poor interpersonal skills and that means no one wants to employ him.
My son downloads Win 7 Enterprise off the MS site here at home and runs it on his PC. He doesn't work at all as he has a mental disability that affects his ability to interact with people he doesn't know so he has poor interpersonal skills and that means no one wants to employ him.
Deadly Ernest
8th Jun 2012
DeadlyErnest,
Perhaps you son and my son can have a play date.
Perhaps you son and my son can have a play date.
jjtoday
8th Jun 2012
1
Vote
What Do You Want to Do?
One point missed in the prior comments is that Windows 8 offers a unified OS. You will be able to use it on your desktop, laptop, netbook, and even tablet. The Windows 8 Metro interface is patterned after the Windows Phone 7 OS. If you use multiple platforms, it's very helpful, and reduces the learning curve, if they all have the same look and feel. Win8 does NOT have to be used with a touch screen. The Metro interface is optimized for that, but you also have the classic desktop that works just fine with a keyboard and mouse.
7th Jun 2012
Replies
That's all great if you have even half of them and want them all the same, especially if you have touch screens for them all, but what about the people who just want a desktop computer that's easy to use - Win 8 fails badly at that point.
As to the Classic desktop, according to what the Microsoft website was saying last week Win 8 does not have the classic interface but have set up Metro to respond to a mouse click, even if it's a bit slower than the older interfaces.
As to the Classic desktop, according to what the Microsoft website was saying last week Win 8 does not have the classic interface but have set up Metro to respond to a mouse click, even if it's a bit slower than the older interfaces.
Deadly Ernest
7th Jun 2012
I was speaking from my personal experience with the Win8 consumer preview and release preview. Obviously, other users' mileage may vary, and usability is a somewhat subjective thing. I think the biggest challenge for non-tech-savvy users will be the absence of the Start button from the classic desktop, but once people learn how to find the search function, they will overcome that.
miketarlton
7th Jun 2012
Mike - is it not a case that you can search simply by typing on the metro interface? You can do that with Server 2012 which also has a metro interface. It isn't that well known yet, but is a neat touch.
Add to the fact that the metro interface is very easy to configure. You can add or delete apps that you want (or don't). Getting to the ones you don't use very often is still only a click or two away. You can even add a desktop on-off button with a few side-ways movements that should be well within the scope of a web designer like Reesa.
It is new, and many don't like it. I think when they realize how easy it is to use and adapt, they will soften quickly.
Add to the fact that the metro interface is very easy to configure. You can add or delete apps that you want (or don't). Getting to the ones you don't use very often is still only a click or two away. You can even add a desktop on-off button with a few side-ways movements that should be well within the scope of a web designer like Reesa.
It is new, and many don't like it. I think when they realize how easy it is to use and adapt, they will soften quickly.
Gemmz
7th Jun 2012
0
Votes
Here are some up-to-date facts...
Windows 8 has it's benefits, but it is aimed mostly towards the consumer industry, especially touch screen PCs. It has its advantages for a business though, such as cross platform standardization. Windows 8 RT tablets, Windows 8 laptops/desktops, and eventually Windows Phone 8. All able to run many of the same applications, minus desktop applications, in which case a few tablets will be capapble of running. Look at whether you'd be interested in going with a Windows Phone 8 or Windows 8 tablet. If not, then for a business, I'd generally suggest going with WIndows 7. Now to address x86(32bit) or x64(64bit) since it seems to be a popular subject. In choosing 64bit Windows, the 64bit refers to the operations of the OS ONLY. As everyone is always quick to claim, this version will allow for a nearly infinite amount of RAM, but many often forget WHY. Twice the bit-bandwidth per clock cycle of the processor, which not only allows for more RAM, but ALSO speeds up the operation of actual Windows, the OS, and is suposed to increase stability (more often than not, isn't the case). How this, in reality, affects your other applications is this. You must make sure your applications are *compatible with Windows 7 64-bit* not whether the application itself is developed in 64-bit. Two different things. Also, if you are using a Domain setup (unlikely, but possible) make sure to get Ultimate. As for Win 7 vs Win XP, for us hardware fanatics, it's an *absolute no brainer.* Windows xp is over a decade old, and it shows. XP is designed to operate, at best, with a single-core processor w/ hyperthreading, heck, it didn't even originally allow for hard drives over 137GB. Don't get me wrong, until recently, XP was the wisest option for a business user, but too many people brag on XP without knowing it's competitors... which is just pure ignorance at it's best. A LOT has happened in the last 11 years, including multicore hyper threaded processors, going from 100+ nanometer(nm) processors to 22nm, hard drives breaching 3TB, complete redesigns of Intel motherboards, hexachannel RAM at frequencies TEN times that of when XP debuted. If you are planning on buying a machine with any hardware developed in the past 5 years, I'd suggest WIndows 7. Desktops and laptops these days are coming with dual/quad/hexa cores... XP will utilize 1 core, 1 hyperthreaded core, Windows 7, all the above. Plus, the design looks less like a thorn in your eye
I'm going to be honest up front, I don't have as much knowledge with Win8. With my current job, I don't have as much time to research and beta test, but this all is my opinion.
8th Jun 2012
Replies
ah, forgot to mention Octa-cores... in the serverside of things, the number of cores is maddening... 11yrs ago, not possible :P Don't get me wrong, XP had updates, but some things you can't change in a patch
zazimi
8th Jun 2012
I have an Asus Aspire 5750G 64bit Laptop,8 gis of Ram, with nVidea Geforce GT520M and I have Windows 7 Home Premium...and I'm happy as Larry! Since I'm an IT Pro,I have yet to see a system as solid or as sound as this one (7).I have absolutely no reservations with reccommending either Windows 7 Home Premium or a 64bit machine but make sure you have at least 4megs of Ram,preferably 8 on a 64bit machine!
v8Cowboy
8th Jun 2012
Just for Clarification, that would be an Acer Aspire
But yeah, if the hardware is new, I'd suggest Win7, if it's touchscreen, eh, why not at least try Win8 with the free upgrade if you can revert (which is likely). It's oftentimes not good for a business to adopt an operating system so soon, but if it's just one person, the costs aren't multiplied out like an enterprise.
zazimi
8th Jun 2012
I don't disagree that XP is long in the tooth. No question that is true. For most consumers, Win7 is likely the way to go. In the commercial real however, XP will continue to have a strong following for some time to come. I have a customer who purchased a $150,000 Accounting/ERP package in 2003-ish that will not run on Windows 7 without a full version upgrade which will in itself cost an additional $35,000. Why on earth would they go to Win7 until they absolutely have no choice?
capeterson67@...
12th Jun 2012
1
Vote
Hey.
I think you should make the switch because windows 8 is the newest operating system, which entails that it is faster more efficient, your current problems would not be the same.
8th Jun 2012
Replies
By that logic, Vista should have been faster and more efficient than the last. At Vista's launch, and for about a good year or two, that was definitely NOT the case. I would suggest caution with Windows 8. You might start by downloading and installing the consumer preview, which is free and is a good way to get acquainted with the new OS. But like others have noted here, if you have an older machine, then neither Win 7 nor Win 8 are likely to run very well, if much at all, on your hardware. That said, Win 7 is a solid platform for both productivity and play. With Win 8, it's definitely a wait and see as to whether or not it will be MS's next OS flop/debacle (a la ME, Vista). Supposedly Win 8 will ship before the year's end, so we won't have long to wait before finding out.
jdyl
9th Jun 2012
agreed with jd, just definately keep in mind that Win8 Preview is just that, a Preview, and not the completed copy, as jd mentions. So there may be some abnormalities or incompatibility that may not be an issue with the retail release. just food for thought.
zazimi
11th Jun 2012
0
Votes
From a business point of view....
Windows 7 has now been available to the public since 2009, service pack 1 was released a while back and numerous other updates have also been made available. Its safe to say the OS is fairly rock solid (although not as solid as XP).
I wouldn't go straight to Windows 8 as your bound to come into some problems as its fairly fresh on the market - go with Windows 7 Pro 64 bit Edition - Adobe CS will be compatible and stable whether you have the 32 or 64 bit version - Windows 7 is the safer bet.
I wouldn't go straight to Windows 8 as your bound to come into some problems as its fairly fresh on the market - go with Windows 7 Pro 64 bit Edition - Adobe CS will be compatible and stable whether you have the 32 or 64 bit version - Windows 7 is the safer bet.
12th Jun 2012

































