General discussion

Locked

Email - on its last legs or growing up?

By monica ·
Many say email is fast approaching the end of its life. Is this true? Will social media take over as the dominate business communications channel? Or will we see a 'polymedial' approach where people become far more selective about which tools are used for which purpose?

My own experience and research suggests the latter is the way most organisations are heading. For example if a communication does not need to be retained as a business record and an urgent repose is needed, then instant messaging tools offer a great alternative to email. Meanwhile, news and status updates are well suited to collaborative tools such as wikis and discussions forums. Such an approach also helps reduce the email overload and creates a pull rather than push information culture which is both less stressful and more mature

On the other hand for all communications which need to be retained email will remain the dominant channel. However, currently email is one of the biggest drains on personal and business productivity. It is also wide open to abuse and is often an easy entry point for cyber crime.

With more choice it would not be surprising therefore if people did shun email in favour of other social media which would be akin to throwing the baby out with the bath water. In five years time we would find ourselves suffering just as badly from information overload.

More to the point is to educate people when and how to use email effectively.

What is your experience?

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

28 total posts (Page 2 of 3)   Prev   01 | 02 | 03   Next
| Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

all right

by highlander718 In reply to IM's lack formality

but your BA and your boss can be considered as exceptions, when truly IM can help. I agree.
Still, I have a longtime colleague, who recently wrote gays instead of guys in an e-mail addressed to multiple recipients....repeatedly ... not by accident :-)

Collapse -

I got one of those

by Slayer_ In reply to IM's lack formality

A miss spelled word auto corrected to incontinence

"The system is having an incontinence issue..."


My boss sent that to customers by accident.

Collapse -

While I too find voice mail irritating,

by CharlieSpencer In reply to Cause voicemail is irrita ...

I find IM to be equally annoying. I can talk a lot faster than I can type, and the lack of a spell checker annoys me to no end. If I need an immediate answer, I reach for the phone first. If it isn't urgent or I don't get an answer, I send an e-mail. I'll respond if a co-worker initiates an IM conversation, but I don't see any advantages in my situation.

Collapse -

Exactly my view, Palmy -nt

by Deadly Ernest In reply to While I too find voice ma ...
Collapse -

Testing

by GSG In reply to Why use Instant Messaging ...

I use IM extensively when I'm helping someone test. I only need to be available if there are issues and they need me to look at what a message looks like in between the sender and receiver. I don't want to stay on the phone the entire time, so they just IM me when I'm needed. It's better than filling up my email as well. That way, I can get some work done instead of just waiting around until I'm needed.

It's also a good way for 1st level tech support to know if I'm at my desk. If it's not an emergency and they need my advice on an issue, they can IM me. However, if they're going to turn over a call to me, they call me instead as it usually requires too many details for an IM.

Collapse -

Email - on its last legs or growing up? IM versus the phone

by monica In reply to Why use Instant Messaging ...

Agree about using the phone. But somehow people will IM before they will either phone or better still walk and talk if in the same office. Does anyone know why?

Collapse -

nope - nt

by Deadly Ernest In reply to Email - on its last legs ...
Collapse -

I think

by highlander718 In reply to Email - on its last legs ...

it's because people are no longer confortable talking face to face. Some prefer to "hide behind the screen", it feels safer.

Collapse -

Perception

by GSG In reply to I think

Management in some organizations thinks that if you aren't at your desk, you aren't working. So, IM is available, and people take advantage of it. Plus, if you work in cubicle land, it's probably preferable to IM than pick up the phone and potentially bother everyone in the area.

I agree that face-to-face is best when possible, but I understand why IM is preferred in some situations.

Collapse -

IM's are nice and quiet

by Slayer_ In reply to Perception

It's a big factor.

Back to Community Forum
28 total posts (Page 2 of 3)   Prev   01 | 02 | 03   Next

General Discussion Forums