Question
-
CreatorTopic
-
October 26, 2007 at 11:11 am #2228109
Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Lockedby jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
I have a Dell Dimension 3000 that is very very slow. I figured I would reformat my HDD and reinstall Windows XP. However, the install takes well over 24 hours to complete. The Bios shows that 512MB RAM is installed. I tried a new 80GB Western Digital HDD in it and that still took over 24 hours to install windows from a freshly formatted drive. The processor cooling fan is running and has good airflow.
Any ideas? Please help.
Dell Dimension 3000
2.4GHz Celeron
512MB RAM
80 GB Maxtor HDDTopic is locked -
CreatorTopic
All Answers
-
AuthorReplies
-
-
October 26, 2007 at 11:11 am #2623829
Clarifications
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Clarifications
-
October 26, 2007 at 11:14 am #2623826
Defaults
by retro77 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Go into the BIOS and load the defaults. Even with the CPU clocked down, 24 hours seems like a long time.
-
October 26, 2007 at 11:38 am #2468146
try this
by wesley.chin · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
I had a machine that was slow also, though not quite as slow as yours I think. Like you, I ran through many options. the one that did it was so obvious….scandisk. after that, the machine was back in its blazing glory.
The problematic machine was a 3 Ghz single core P4 running WinXP Pro SP2 with a gig of RAM.
-
October 26, 2007 at 12:15 pm #2468116
I don’t think scandisk will help
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to try this
This problem occurs on 2 different HDDs and one of them was new. I did however perform the scandisk on the original while windows was loading on the new HDD and no errors or corrupt/bad sectors/blocks were found.
-
-
October 26, 2007 at 11:49 am #2468137
This probably won’t help
by davemarriage · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
But, I installed a new HD in my laptop and was trying to load XP. 3 hours later I kept getting .dll errors. I tried this over and over with mixed results, but I kept getting different .dll errors. I tried another XP disc and it worked with flying colors. The old disc didn’t have a scratch on it either.
Also, does your CD/DVD-ROM function normally?
-
October 26, 2007 at 12:13 pm #2468118
I don’t think its the cd
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to This probably won’t help
I don’t think its the Win XP CD because it was very slow to begin with and that is why I decided to reformat the HDD and reinstall windows.
-
October 28, 2007 at 9:30 am #2467284
I think its the CD
by ashell.b · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to I don’t think its the cd
Or that the CD would be a good place to start. If you know how to make a back up copy of your CD, do it, and then install from the back. (this might be hard for the everyday user to do)
-If the CD takes a long time to copy, its the CD.
-If you can’t burn a backup, its the CD burner. (this is assuming your computer is up and running to make a copy)The way around this is to just borrow a friends media.
If both of these steps go fine and the back up installs slowly, its time for a new HD, but really I would just consider a new PC since you said it has been slow. The computer might not met your needs anymore.
-
-
-
October 26, 2007 at 3:08 pm #2468032
Something here is very wrong . . .
by older mycroft · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Try this link:
http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/System-Info/SiSoftware-Sandra.shtml
Download and install SANDRA. Let it run through ALL the benchmarking routines.
Hopefully you’ll be better aware as to what is causing this bottleneck in your system, because something is very slow and very wrong.
-
October 27, 2007 at 9:15 pm #2467375
How to use Sandra
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Something here is very wrong . . .
So I have installed Sandra, but don’t quite understand benchmarking. I realize that I am comparing to other processors or machines etc. Should I be using the test for diagnostics instead? Not sure if this helps, but i noticed that when running something as simple as device manager my cpu usage jumps to 100%. Could my processor be the culprit? I have swapped HDDs, HDD ribbon cable, and RAM
-
October 28, 2007 at 5:27 pm #2467210
compare measurements to published specs of devices
by absolutely · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to How to use Sandra
They’re likely to all be slightly different (“3 GHz” CPUs frequently measure 2.99, or occasionally 3.01, but NEVER 3.00 in my experience!), but if you find one that’s 10x as slow as what was printed on the packaging, you know that’s “broken”.
-
-
-
October 26, 2007 at 4:10 pm #2468017
Why not take this opportunity to test-drive a Linux LiveCD.
by absolutely · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
If you like it, why not see if the corresponding distribution’s full version installs on your hard drive? If it does, who cares what the problem is with Windows? If not, what have you lost?
-
October 26, 2007 at 4:21 pm #2468013
How will Linux help?
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Why not take this opportunity to test-drive a Linux LiveCD.
I think its obvious that Windows isn’t the problem. It’s a hardware issue. It would only be a waste of time, would it not? More time is what I’ve got to lose.
-
October 26, 2007 at 4:43 pm #2468007
Do as I suggested above . . . ‘benchmarking’.
by older mycroft · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to How will Linux help?
You need to run some ‘soak-testing’ on your hardware and the easiest way to do that is to benchmark it.
-
October 27, 2007 at 2:23 pm #2467445
A very good idea.
by absolutely · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Do as I suggested above . . . ‘benchmarking’.
Determine the problem precisely and certainly. Good troubleshooting.
-
October 26, 2007 at 10:48 pm #2467941
If Linux will not install, you will know it’s really a hardware issue.
by absolutely · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to How will Linux help?
From here, that looks like an unproven assumption. Also, I think that open source software will offer you more productive use of your time in the long run, and in my experience Linux is able to recognize many partition table problems that stump Windows install discs and MS fdisk floppies.
-
-
-
October 27, 2007 at 3:25 pm #2467418
HD failing
by cookieorc · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
It could be that you hard drive is failing… That is really slow…
-
October 27, 2007 at 9:17 pm #2467373
not HD
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to HD failing
as stated in the initial post, I have tried a different HDD. I have also since tried a different HDD ribbon cable and RAM.
-
-
October 27, 2007 at 9:35 pm #2467370
processor
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
This has the Intel 865GV MB. I have a spare processor AMD Athlon XP 2400+. Will this processor work on this motherboard? Even for testing purposes to see if the processor is the problem?
-
December 9, 2008 at 6:48 pm #2974181
YES!! its the battery!!!!
by mike · about 15 years, 3 months ago
In reply to processor
Hi Everyone
I am a professional computer consultant. As far as I can tell, this forum is frequented by amatuers. I hope my EXPERT experience will be appreciated.
The problem I decided to register for, is as follows: The DEll Dimension 3000 series, has a typematic delay, which is absolutely maddening.
The confirmed problem: The CMOS battery. I have never seen a problem like this in my career. I want to thank the original poster of this thread, for your endurance and persistance. If not for this forum, and your persistance, I may have given up. There were *NO* other signs pointing to the battery.
TO the other detractors/posters, POSEING as experts: You are the reason sites like this generally don’t work. kindly stop posting here, forever. you are NOT helping anyone.
Later!
Mike LaRonde
a REAL Computer expert
mike@jplot.com-
December 10, 2008 at 12:46 am #2974081
“mike@… the professional ZOMBIE-HUNTER! Couple of small points…
by older mycroft · about 15 years, 3 months ago
In reply to YES!! its the battery!!!!
Despite your [b]Profeshinul “[i]this forum is frequented by amatuers[/i]”[/b] status – you’ve just been awarded the latest edition of the TR Zombie Trophy, for having successfully resurrected a 14 MONTH-OLD thread! Well done for that inanely amateur achievement!! 😉
Unfortunately your proposition that you are the only one to have solved this particular problem would have been ever-so-slightly stronger, had your problem been the same as the one that this thread was about! [b]It’s NOT![/b]
[i]Ah well, back to the land of dreams, eh![/i] :^0
-
-
-
October 27, 2007 at 9:36 pm #2467369
MB
by bcpgm · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Take out any non-essential parts, NIC, Modem card, Sound card, and so on unless they are built-in.
If it is still slow, it’s got to be the motherboard.
-
October 28, 2007 at 12:52 pm #2467262
MB battery?
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Does this make sense? I pulled the battery off of the MB and I suddenly notice a significant difference in speed.
-
October 28, 2007 at 1:15 pm #2467261
MB battery it is
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to MB battery?
It is the battery itself. With it in, it crawls. With it out, it runs normally.
-
October 28, 2007 at 1:40 pm #2467259
CMOS Battery…
by jbafile · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to MB battery it is
By pulling the battery, you reset your BIOS by forcing your machine to recognize settings and ignoring stored settings.
The problem had to have been a setting within your BIOS.
My question to you so I understand is when you reinsert the battery does the computer go back to being extremely slow, or is it still running at normal speed?
-
October 28, 2007 at 2:07 pm #2467251
battery
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to CMOS Battery…
It slows back down when i reinsert the battery. So I just left it out for the time being until I can get to Wal-Mart and buy a new one.
-
October 28, 2007 at 5:28 pm #2467209
bizarre
by absolutely · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to MB battery it is
I have never heard of that being a solution to any problem.
-
October 29, 2007 at 6:13 am #2468761
This sounds like a work of fiction . . .
by older mycroft · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to MB battery it is
It’s a novel that I’ve never read.
What happened to the definitive use of an alternative OS or the installation of diagnostic benchmarking software as previously advocated but seemingly -never- adopted…?
If this is just a ‘guessing-game’ count me out! I’ve got better things to do with my time…!
-
October 29, 2007 at 6:16 am #2468759
I’m with you…
by jbafile · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to This sounds like a work of fiction . . .
Let the guessing begin…
The strange solutions keep piling up.
-
October 29, 2007 at 6:43 am #2468748
Think what you wish
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to This sounds like a work of fiction . . .
I didn’t quite understand the benchmarking technique. I did use it, but I didn’t know what to compare it to, so it didn’t really tell me anything. I’m sure that if I understood exactly how to use it, it may have pointed me to the processor or motherboard. I already knew it had to be one of the two, because as I stated previously I had tried a different HDD, HDD ribbon cable, RAM, and all options removed. I did not have a LiveCD, so that is why I didn’t go that route. I am a copier/fax tech and one of my colleagues reminded me of one of our obsolete faxes that had a backup battery. When the backup battery would fail, it would pull down the 5V supply. I simply pulled the battery and it was like flipping a light switch. The thing ran smoothly and flawlessly. I put the battery back on and it dragged again. I went and bought a new battery and things are back to normal. Thanks for all the suggestions.
-
October 29, 2007 at 12:05 pm #2468573
Hocus – Pocus, what a lot of TWADDLE !!!
by older mycroft · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Think what you wish
I think you may find that your comparison of a computer to a fax machine, is as incredulous as your solving the ‘problem’ by removing a CMOS battery!
You may as well have fed the computer a couple of Aspirins with a mug of warm milk!!!
-
October 29, 2007 at 12:27 pm #2468564
Spread cheeks, remove head.
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Hocus – Pocus, what a lot of TWADDLE !!!
Sounds like you need to find a new job then if you don’t think a CMOS battery can cause this type of problem. I hope you’re not getting paid to be an IT Consultant, cuz I hate idiots that think they know it all. I came here looking for suggestions and I used what I could. I simply posted my resolution on here for those who assisted me in trouble shooting. I do not have a lot of IT experience, but I do have a lot of electronics experience and I understand how a defective battery can pull down a supply voltage. I won’t bother explaining that to you though being that if your out of your league in IT, then you’re definitely out of your league in Ohm’s law.
-
October 29, 2007 at 1:06 pm #2468541
But what does a CMOS battery do?
by jamesrl · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Spread cheeks, remove head.
I think if you decide to understand the issue, instead of throwing mud, you might understand that a CMOS battery has but a couple of simple functions.
It provides power to the clock so that when the machine is turned off it will retain its time settings.
Similarly it powers the BIOS so that the settings for the HW do not dissapear when the AC is gone.
Without the battery, the system sets up to defaults. So unless your BIOS was very badly setup, the battery wouldn’t be the cause.
Generally, most motherboards are designed to report a battery failure at the first sign of lowered output, so as to not cause clock issues.
James
-
October 29, 2007 at 2:04 pm #2468527
Forget about what it does
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Spread cheeks, remove head.
Think about how it works. Again, an IT person that thinks he knows it all. You don’t understand how electronics work at the board level. Stick to what you know best and quit trying to assume the rest. It’ll get you in trouble. I will say it again….I simply was giving the resolution to my problem. You don’t have to believe me, but since you don’t I urge you to google bad cmos battery symptoms and I’m sure you will find a plethora of possible symptoms. So mine may have been few and far between, but it is what it is.
-
October 30, 2007 at 4:43 am #2469012
RAILGUN set well above ‘stun level’ . . .
by older mycroft · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Spread cheeks, remove head.
[i]”I hope you’re not getting paid to be an IT Consultant, cuz I hate idiots that think they know it all.”[/i]
…coming from one such as you, that comment is a bit of a misnomer!
[i]”I came here looking for suggestions and I used what I could.”[/i]
[b]Actually – you didn’t![/b] What you did was you came here and posted a problem.
A problem that was then replied to with no less than [b]SIX[/b] possible solutions [ Scandisk, CD, Sandra, Linux, Benchmarking, Harddrive. ]At each and every turn, as the various possible solutions were offered to you, you rebutted every one of them by stating categorically that YOU couldn’t ‘see’ how that could possibly be the cause or would help.
Therefore I put it to you, if anyone is professing to be an expert within the confines of this thread – it is you!
[i]”I simply posted my resolution on here for those who assisted me in trouble shooting.”[/i]
All we did was provide targets to be derided by your self-inflated ego.
[i]”I do not have a lot of IT experience, but I do have a lot of electronics experience and I understand how a defective battery can pull down a supply voltage”[/i]
Your correct – you don’t have [b]ANY[/b] IT experience from what I’ve seen, but the defective battery can only affect a badly set-up CMOS BIOS as has been previously suggested to you.
[i]”I won’t bother explaining that to you though being that if your [u]out of your league[/u]* in IT, then you’re definitely [u]out of your league[/u]** in Ohm’s law”[/i]
* should be “out of your [u]depth[/u]”
** should be “[u]not in the same league[/u]”“[i]Stick to what you know best and quit trying to assume the rest. It’ll get you in trouble.[/i]”
Wise words – you should try them sometime.
“[i]I will say it again….I simply was giving the resolution to my problem.[/i]”
[b][u]Here lies the nub of the whole affair.[/b][/u]
[b]You[/b] gave the ‘answer’ to [b]Your[/b] problem.I wouldn’t be at all surprised if you print out the whole thread, mount it in a frame and hang it on your wall, for all your friends to see how incredibly clever you are in solving a problem that TechRepublic couldn’t solve.
The fact that the problem is nefarious and the solution only covers the fact that your BIOS was to blame, a BIOS that YOU must have set up badly, doesn’t seem to have been considered by you.
Still – it’ll look good covering up the crack on the wall!
The wall where you no doubt hang all your $5 internet electronics qualifications.
-
October 30, 2007 at 9:36 am #2469799
Right over you’re head!
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Spread cheeks, remove head.
?Actually – you didn’t! What you did was you came here and posted a problem.
A problem that was then replied to with no less than SIX possible solutions [ Scandisk, CD, Sandra, Linux, Benchmarking, Harddrive. At each and every turn, as the various possible solutions were offered to you, you rebutted every one of them by stating categorically that YOU couldn’t ‘see’ how that could possibly be the cause or would help.?
If you would use a little logic, which apparently you don’t have, you would see that the both the HDD and scandisk was not the problem, because I put in a second (known good) HDD and the problem was still there. This eliminates both the HDD and scandisk. Right? Ok, let me answer that for your. Yes, it does.
As for the CD, I had 2 Windows XP CDs, win 98, and vista. The machine was dragging even when not reading the CD. Does that rule out the cd? Let me answer that for you again. Yes!
Now we are down to Benchmarking, Sandra, and Linux. I did not have a linux live cd, so I did not try that as stated in an earlier post. Wake up and pay attention. I also stated that I didn’t quite understand the whole point of Benchmarking which is one thing that Sandra can perform. See, this is me being honest with myself and everyone on here. If I don’t know how to do something, I’ll tell you and not pretend I do. Maybe Sandra would have told me that I had a bad CMOS battery, I don’t really know. At this point, it doesn’t really matter.You deny being a self proclaimed expert, but you are the one that said, “Hocus – Pocus, what a lot of TWADDLE !!! * I think you may find that your comparison of a computer to a fax machine, is as incredulous as your solving the ‘problem’ by removing a CMOS battery! You may as well have fed the computer a couple of Aspirins with a mug of warm milk!!!?
Let me explain something that may be difficult for you to understand. MFPs (Mult-function copier) are one of the most complex pieces of equipment in the office. If a copier is to be networked, it basically has to have a PC mounted on the back of it. In order for it to fax a document, it has to have a modem. The machine uses lamps that don?t produce any heat, it uses an induction coil to create heat. It has a scanner (most full color now days) built in. Simply, the ability to be able to push a single sheet of 20lb paper thru a machine while going thru an obstacle course is a great feat in itself.
*are you sure you?re not from France?
?Your correct** – you don’t have ANY IT experience from what I’ve seen, but the defective battery can only affect a badly set-up CMOS BIOS as has been previously suggested to you.?
**should be You?re – since you want to correct grammar
When I stated that my problem was with the CMOS battery. You mentioned that a defective battery can only affect a badly set-up CMOS BIOS. I beg to differ. It’s time to take off those blinders. As I also mentioned in an earlier post, try using google sometime and you will find a plethora of symptoms from a bad CMOS battery. Yes, a CMOS battery is simply a backup to hold your BIOS settings, but that does not mean that it can not affect other things.
As far as your IT experience compared to mine. It is apparent that I have more experience than you do which doesn’t say much, but atleast I know how to use a little logic when trouble shooting and not rely on software to do the job for me. The only thing that you may have more experience with is Sandra (benchmarking), but you haven’t proven that here so I certainly won’t assume the same.
?I wouldn’t be at all surprised if you print out the whole thread, mount it in a frame and hang it on your wall, for all your friends to see how incredibly clever you are in solving a problem that TechRepublic couldn’t solve.?
Actually I don?t need to have it framed. I?m not as self-centered as you appear to be. I never said that TechRepublic couldn?t solve my problem. I came here for suggestions and I got suggestions. It got me thinking and I resolved my problem. You, however, didn?t have any part in that, but I won?t hold it against TechRepublic.
?The fact that the problem is nefarious and the solution only covers the fact that your BIOS was to blame, a BIOS that YOU must have set up badly, doesn’t seem to have been considered by you.?
Why don?t you consider this since you know it all. If in fact it were my BIOS that I improperly set up, then simply removing the battery and putting it back on would have resolved my problem. Right? Yes! However, since I put the same battery back on and my problem came back, what does that tell you? Keep in mind that I didn?t change any BIOS settings. I just put the same battery back on and the problem came back. I went out and bought a new battery, put it in, and everything works normally. Explain that one!
The wall where you no doubt hang all your $5 internet electronics qualifications.
Well, I guess that explains how you got your IT qualifications. I didn?t even know you could do such a thing. Just so you know, I have proven myself with my electronics skills with the companies I work for. I?m the youngest person in my field at my company as well as my previous company and my skills fine tuned enough that I was asked to train all of my coworkers. I have been doing so for 1 ? years and have earned greater respect for it. That?s something to be proud of. Don?t confuse that with being chauvinistic. -
October 30, 2007 at 11:21 am #2469727
You don’t seem to want to learn
by jamesrl · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Spread cheeks, remove head.
You seem to think anyone who knows more than you is a know it all. Far from it. Mycroft and many others here have a great deal of experience and are willing to share with anyone. Trust me, he may be crusty at times, but I’ve seen him go the extra mile to help someone.
I know Mycroft is older than me, and I’ve been messing with computers since before the first IBM PC. Your 18 months in electronics pales in comparison.
Troubleshooting, as you well know from electronics, can be a process of systematic elimination of possible causes. Some of the steps you were shown were more “likely” to be the cause than the CMOS battery. Thats from years of experience. Simply put hard drives are more often the cause of problems than batteries (both will eventually die). Hard drives have moving parts.
You are so proud you found the solution, and think that all the other steps were bogus. Good for you. If you were open, you might have learned more about computers than when you started.
James
-
October 30, 2007 at 12:19 pm #2469694
Another on the band wagon
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Spread cheeks, remove head.
You don’t seem to want to learn
You seem to think anyone who knows more than you is a know it all. Far from it. Mycroft and many others here have a great deal of experience and are willing to share with anyone. Trust me, he may be crusty at times, but I’ve seen him go the extra mile to help someone.
I only said that about Mycroft. This all started because of Mycroft?s snooty comment about the CMOS battery being the problem. He initially said it was bogus. He was flat out wrong and isn?t man enough to admit when he is wrong.
I know Mycroft is older than me, and I’ve been messing with computers since before the first IBM PC. Your 18 months in electronics pales in comparison.
I didn?t say my electronics experience has been 18 months, that was my training experience. I?m sure you still have more computer experience than me and there definitely is something to be said about experience. I don?t discount that. I only discounted Mycroft?s comments. He has a poor attitude when he?s wrong.
Troubleshooting, as you well know from electronics, can be a process of systematic elimination of possible causes. Some of the steps you were shown were more “likely” to be the cause than the CMOS battery. Thats from years of experience. Simply put hard drives are more often the cause of problems than batteries (both will eventually die). Hard drives have moving parts.
I do agree with this 100%. It makes sense to start with the most common thing that fails. That is fine. I never bashed anyone for their ideas or suggestions. I simply stated reasons why I know for sure it isn?t one thing or another. Don?t you agree that if I replaced the HDD with a known working one that that eliminates the HDD itself? Process of elimination right? I didn?t expect someone to give an exact resolution for my problem. I appreciate everyone who helped. I work in tech support myself. I?m not right on the first time, but with a little trouble shooting I can get you there.
You are so proud you found the solution, and think that all the other steps were bogus. Good for you. If you were open, you might have learned more about computers than when you started.
I am proud that I found the resolution. It means the headache is finally over with. Do I think I figured it out all on my own? No, I don?t. Did anyone ever suggest pulling the CMOS battery? No, they didn?t. Did the suggestions possibly point me indirectly to the CMOS battery? Sure, I was pointed toward the processor/MB. Please show me anywhere in this forum that I stated anything was bogus without giving a reason as to why it was bogus. You won?t find one. I gave a reason every time as to why I have already ruled one thing or another out. Or simply (benchmarking for instance) where I didn?t quite understand how to do something.
Jon
-
-
May 6, 2008 at 11:56 am #2460163
Same problem/resolution
by cmessina · about 15 years, 11 months ago
In reply to MB battery?
Just replying to defend you from some of the trolls. I’ve got a Dimension 3000 in my shop in which the hard drive crashed and XP needed to be installed on a new drive.
Short version – the install was going insanely slow so I googled and found this thread. Shut off the machine, pulled the battery, and tried the install again with a massive speed increase.
For whatever reason, the battery was the problem, and removing it solved the problem.
-chris
-
April 25, 2009 at 11:42 pm #2960384
….didn’t believe the post…until I tried it…
by kenaniah7037 · about 14 years, 11 months ago
In reply to Same problem/resolution
Fixing up a friend’s Dell Dimension 1100….he bought the parts (HD, RAM, peripherals…), and I’ve been putting them together. Now, I’ve spent TWO DAYS!! (granted, between doing family outings, etc..)trying to install XP pro on the HD…..tried two different cd’s, tried a HD I had spare, changed IDE cables, changed RAM, reset every BIOS setting that applied, (and was saying nasty things about the old Phoenix BIOs, I might add..), then while waiting(again) for setup to copy files, I started researching this boggle. When I read the above posts about the battery, I shook my head and thought it was bunk. But an hour or so later it had still only copied 32%, so I gave in and pulled the battery. This was 20 minutes ago, and as I sit here now,it appears to be about 80% through “preparing installation” on the blue xp setup page…it finished copying files in 93 seconds (yes, I timed it!). And now I just hopped over and entered the product key, and it’s flying through “installing network”…now I have to do some reading and figure out exactly why that worked!
Thanks for the post.
-
-
March 21, 2009 at 12:20 pm #2773778
You are absolutely CORRECT
by thejones · about 15 years ago
In reply to MB battery?
I had this same issue with a Dell Dimension 4600. I replaced everything, hard drive, ram, cpu, fan, power supply, IDE cables. I removed all cards and cables not necessary for installation of Windows XP. Installation was still taking hours and hours, after overnight install was still stuck on 39% of setup copying files. I tried a new Windows XP disc, nothing different. I found this post and thought this will never work. I pulled the CMOS Battery for 30 seconds. Put everything back in it that was originally in it before I started replacing things, and tried installation again and it ran with lightning speed. I couldn’t believe that was all that it took to make this work. You are genius! Thanks so much for you help, I was ready to scrap this one and say the MB was bad. Incredible! Thanks!
-
-
October 30, 2007 at 11:38 am #2469712
Experience with Bad CMOS battery causing issues
by jdclyde · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
I have seen on cheap crap MB’s that the system will pause every now and then, and the clock will actually lose time over the day.
Change the battery and it is good, for another 6 months.
I have never seen this behavior with a quality MB. I would wonder about the board Dell used in that system. Being a 2.4 celeron, it is a safe bet it was a system bought for the price not the quality.
-
October 30, 2007 at 12:01 pm #2469701
I agree 100%
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Experience with Bad CMOS battery causing issues
This is a friends machine. His kids are home schooled and it was bought just for them to do school work. The MB probably isn’t great quality.
-
-
October 30, 2007 at 12:26 pm #2469687
So – tell us then! Now that YOU have solved the problem…
by older mycroft · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Just how long does it now take to install Win XP ???
-
October 30, 2007 at 12:50 pm #2469674
about 1 hour
by jonatay325 · about 16 years, 5 months ago
In reply to So – tell us then! Now that YOU have solved the problem…
Just under 1 hour using the Dell CD. It also installs some other Dell crap ofcourse.
-
November 27, 2007 at 6:10 am #2633530
Had similar problem
by eth1958 · about 16 years, 4 months ago
In reply to about 1 hour
Had similar problem w/old lady’s dell, came to TR for resolution, removal of battery resolved issue, prob. just a crappy mb as someone suggested!
-
May 6, 2008 at 12:32 pm #2460152
So we all have learned something not new but ..
by Anonymous · about 15 years, 11 months ago
In reply to about 1 hour
Forgotten. Ohm’s law is still related to computers. But jonatay325, we help people on TechRepublic not slag them down. Nice to know that your system is running good though.
Please post back if you have any more problems or questions.
-
May 6, 2008 at 5:06 pm #2461120
I had The same Problem
by jdmarco12 · about 15 years, 11 months ago
In reply to So we all have learned something not new but ..
without your post i was ready to junk the pc
but removing the battery did the jobthanks
-
-
September 4, 2009 at 10:43 am #3020273
Congratulations…
by occorled · about 14 years, 6 months ago
In reply to So – tell us then! Now that YOU have solved the problem…
For the record, I realize this is an old thread – I read the entire thing.
I found this thread because I was searching for a very similar problem. And this thread solved it. My problem was the CMOS battery as well. And it makes sense now that I think about it, because it affects the preservation of BIOS options that could cause it to default to non-optimal microcodes. Maybe with a really low charge only certain options are preserved, and maybe others still are corrupted. Of course a better BIOS may default to more optimal microcodes, and thus not everyone gets this problem by removing or having a dead battery.
Just wanted to say… wow, is “OldER Mycroft” a douche or what. This guy’s greatest achievement is probably his involvement on this forum (choking with advertisements I might add). Or maybe it’s handing out “zombie trophies”, that I will no doubt get for adding feedback on an old thread.
There are literally hundreds of thousands of benchmark suites out there, some of which I’ve used myself while programming test micro-controller logic in a Computer Architecture for my Computer Science masters. Some of which I’ve used afterwards to debug a performance issue. But you know what, they aren’t necessary to solve every problem. Also they can be complicated – so I feel for the original poster of this thread. He already did a good job of isolating the problem, and I don’t blame him for not running a bunch of benchmarks he’s unfamiliar with in a *REALLY F-ING SLOW* environment, just to get some results he wouldn’t understand anyway AND may not be conclusive enough to identify his problem.
Some people need to grow-up and legitimately *help* someone with a computer problem, not berate them because they haven’t had as much experience….
-
-
December 4, 2007 at 7:08 am #2543795
Same thing just happend
by chady · about 16 years, 3 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
I had a very similar issue. Every time when I went to load windows, it was SOOO slow, and would lockup just after asking for time zone, and user/computer information. I went in to winternals ERD commander, and even that was horribly slow. I tried to do a disk check, but after hours, and only getting a couple of % I, decided to just wipe the HDD, another couple of hours, and only up to .4%! I tried swapping out the hhd because it was kind of making a weird sound. With a known good working one I STILL had the same thing. Tried new RAM, reset the bios to defaults, the CD, CD drive, cables. At that point, getting very frustrated and about 2:00 am I went Wal-mart and bought a new battery for the thing. Immediately it came to life, had windows up and going in ~1 hour, less updates.
Dell 4600
2.6 GHz
256 RAM
40 GB HHD -
December 9, 2008 at 7:05 pm #2974175
My hell is was the cmos battery!
by rcschlieper · about 15 years, 3 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
After 30 hour install i was trying to figure out what it could possibly be… long of the short replaced cmos battery and it was fixed problem solved. Thanks
-
May 1, 2010 at 5:02 pm #2830232
CMOS battery YES YES YES .. thank you
by catlady13 · about 13 years, 11 months ago
In reply to My hell is was the cmos battery!
I was having the same problem with an old HP pavilion 7935 that belongs to my brother. It sat for over 12 hours and was only 50% copying files to format and reinstall windows XP. I got a new CMOS battery and it did the same thing in about 15 minutes. I never would have guessed.
-
June 14, 2010 at 6:05 am #3027475
Replaced Everything Except Battery
by mlyourich · about 13 years, 9 months ago
In reply to CMOS battery YES YES YES .. thank you
I even replaced the motherboard and that battery was bad too. What a coincidence. Yeah, so the battery was the problem here to. Racked my brain for days. After replacing RAM, HD, Disconnecting everything non-essential and replacing the MB. It ends up being a $1 battery. Wow!
-
-
-
March 28, 2009 at 9:46 am #2993094
Genius
by patents · about 15 years ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
I’ve been struggling with the same problem for the past week, replaced HDD, RAM, reinstalled XP three times with different disks, and run every diagnostic known to man. I googled one more time before just trashing the machine, and came upon this thread. Five minutes later, lightning speed. I don’t care HOW it worked, I’m just delighted THAT it worked!
-
March 30, 2009 at 11:44 am #2949388
Not Battery But close
by m · about 15 years ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Hyper-threading was probably turned off in the bios. Reseting the bios will fix the problem or enabling hyper-threading. I had this issue today with a Dimension 3000. Took nearly 2 days to install XP. Once fixed it took 25 minutes.
-modimanz
-
June 20, 2009 at 7:36 am #2958242
PROBLEM FOUND! THIS WORKED GREAT!!
by keithbillard · about 14 years, 9 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
What ever happens to these poor computers bios’s is beyond me but it seems as if it affects the transfer speed of the drives. I saw posts here for battery issues with the motherboard which is partially true. I spend almost 4 days trying to figure out this wone and i decided to let people know so they won’t have the headache I did.
Basically what needs to be done is the IDE on the bios chip needs to be reconfigured. And the funny thing is you cannot do this via the bios.
This is how i fixed it.
1. Plug in the computer
2. Pull battery out.
3. Turn machine on for about 30 seconds
4. unplug the power cable. Leave out for about 1 minute
5. Plug in the power cable and let the bios reconfigure the ide devices. The cddrive even sounded different after i did this.
6. Install windows again. and you should be fine. Its how i fixed the problem. Hope it fixes yours as well.keith
-
December 6, 2010 at 12:09 pm #2871605
Failing Battery?
by errol bertram · about 13 years, 3 months ago
In reply to PROBLEM FOUND! THIS WORKED GREAT!!
Removing the battery & putting it back in worked for me on my Dell Dimension 2400.
I believe my battery might be failing. This may have caused the IDE devices to be out of whack.
-
December 6, 2010 at 12:51 pm #2871589
Actually with that
by oh smeg · about 13 years, 3 months ago
In reply to Failing Battery?
It’s far more likely that the BIOS Settings where wrong and removing the BIOS Battery allowed them to return to the BIOS Makers Defaults.
Though you should check the BIOS Battery every few years and replace if they are below 3 V. 😉
Col
-
-
-
February 20, 2010 at 3:59 pm #2818383
The Battery Tricks Worked For Me!!
by troycity · about 14 years, 1 month ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Same as many of you, I was reinstalling XP on a Dell Dimension 4300, and could not figure out why it took hours to install!! Goolged it and found this thread. Well in my case it was the battery. Took the old one out, put another one from another pc and sure enough the install was completed in less than 45 minutes. So, as a good advice before trying changing the HD, Ram, try the battery, it worked for me.
Thank you all for you input and advice.
Peace.
Troy
-
February 22, 2011 at 6:57 am #2889961
Well I’m amazed!
by matt’ll fix it · about 13 years, 1 month ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
I have been fixing computers on a professional level for 4 years now and have never seen a problem like this, I have fixed many Dell computers too, normaly worse happens is that the battery go’s flat and it wont keep time and date settings, but this is something else! I thought there was strange things going on in the bios settings on boot up, so unsual so which is why i’ve commented, Jonatay well done!!
-
February 22, 2011 at 6:59 am #2889960
Reponse To Answer
by matt’ll fix it · about 13 years, 1 month ago
In reply to Well I’m amazed!
Sorry, meant Mike!
-
-
June 16, 2011 at 6:28 pm #2845796
Techrepublic and you all save another dell from the dump
by mikewbc · about 12 years, 9 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Like a lot of you I was pulling my hair out and was ready to send a Dell 4550 to the scrap pile. After 8 hours and only 50% loaded, I did one last search and found this thread. Stopped the install, replaced the battery, and in 10 minutes I’m almost done. Too bad the most current replys are not on top. I almost gave up before I got to the real answer.
-
June 17, 2011 at 7:51 am #2845755
ALWAYS try hard-boot
by oldbaritone · about 12 years, 9 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
including pull ALL the power including CMOS and let it restart from scratch.
-
August 27, 2011 at 5:45 am #2899279
Thanks
by mustafanabaa · about 12 years, 7 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
really i wanna thank you i have just faced the same problem and the idiot man how bought the PC from me thought me a hustler
when the battery get replaced every think gone quickly so thank you -
September 26, 2011 at 3:01 pm #2899727
The battery tricks worked for me too
by marylove44 · about 12 years, 6 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
Same as many of you, I was reinstalling XP on a Dell OptiPlex GX240, and could not figure out why it took a day an 1/2 to install i ask.com and found this thread. Well in my case it was the battery. Took the old one out, put another one in from a old pc and sure enough the install was completed in less than 40 minutes. an it worked for me 2.
Thank ALL 9/26/2011 -
January 13, 2012 at 10:00 am #2438767
Slow XP Install
by hjh10 · about 12 years, 2 months ago
In reply to Very Slow Dell Dimension 3000 – 24hrs to install Win XP
The battery removal suggestion is an absolutely grand idea. Thank you all for your help. Just became a member here because of everyone’s help. Look forward to typing with ya’ll!
-
-
AuthorReplies