+ 0 Votes Question for setup option other than the above... mustafa_ma 7 years ago My goal is to actually setup the two routers as above, but so far my inquiries say that it's impossible given the hardware available to me. Another option is to make it as follows: ADSL ISP <--wired--> 2wire Router <--wired--> DI-624 <--wired & wireless--> my pc Note that i plan to have different wifi networks from each wireless routers, and will connect my pc to the DI-624 by normal wired connection. This is so that all the users in my home can choose which wireless network that is stronger (implement roaming capabilities of their wifi adapters). The 2wire router is working fine so far (as the existing network). The 2wire router does not have a wan output, only 4 lan ports. The 624 has a wan input, and 4 ports. I have tried to setup the wan portion of the 624 to match the 2wire network and connecting there (using and unused ip address from the 2wire statically). Using this setup, i can't ping the pc's that are connected to the 2wire, (from my pc that is physically connected to the 624), but no internet. I have also tried to use a bogus wan address (184.108.40.206 etc) and connecting the 2wire lan port to the 624 lan port (and matching the network). Using this setup, i can ping the pc's that are connected to the 2wire (from my pc that is physically connected to the 624), but no internet. On both setups above, DHCP is disabled. I don't know if it's actually possible to have the 2wire do all the DHCP task? I tried to point the gateway to the 2wire AND the 624, but no success as well. Any thoughts? any help in this matter is very VERY appreciated. Sincerely, Moose + 0 Votes What you need to do is check for Wireless Distribution Support (WDS) Charles Bundy Updated - 2 years ago on the two routers. I googled and pretty sure neither of the devices you listed support WDS. Read more here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_distribution_system You could check DD-WRT or Tomato and see if there is a router firmware replacement for the D-Link/2Wire. I know DD-WRT supports WDS. + 0 Votes This not that hard... php007 7 years ago What you are referring to is called subnetting. However, there is no way that this can be done in commercial router such as 2wire or dlink. The easiest way to implement is as follows. I have the exact same setup and to this day i have never had a problem. The way you set it up is let your 2wire router handle dhcp and dlink act as an access point. So your setup should be like this 2Wire: DHCP Enabled IP Add: 192.168.1.254 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Then disable the dhcp on Dlink first (this is important and you know it already so taht good) Dlink: DHCP Disabled IP Add: 2wire should automatically assign an ip address once you connect it or you can have static ip address so everytime you connect this router it get the same ip address 192.168.1.129 (this is to be done in 2wire) mask: 255.255.255.0 Once that is done any pc connected through wired ethernet or wifi should automatically get ip address from the 2wire router. Now you should be able to ping even with a static ip address. Advice: Assign static ip address in your 2wire router configuration and not through windows. If you assign static ip addr through windows make sure your gateway is 192.168.1.254 (your 2wire router and not your dlink router). + 0 Votes ONE Network 2 Access Points markosjal 6 years ago in your case I recommend the following: Turn off DHCP server on Dlink Set Dlink touter LAN IP to an IP that is outside of the DHCP range of the 2wire, but within same subnet. For instance if 2 wire begins DHCP IP addresses to your PCs at 192.168.1.100, then you could safely set the DLINK LAN IP to 192.168.1.99 Conform the SSID and encryption settings on the Dlink to those of the 2 wire. I am not clear on whether you should use a different channel for each, or the same, as I have read conflicting information on this! cable from 2 wire LAN port to Dlink LAN Port (yes you read this right! LAN to LAN). You may need a crossover cable tor this to work. You now have ONE network that has two access points on the same subnet, and with the same SSID, which means you can roam freely between the two access points , without reestablishing the wireless connection! You will not use subnets, nor would I recommend it! + 0 Votes As to why the not-cable connected setup... JonahElijah 3 years ago I too have a setup where we have one internet connection, a Qwest DSL. The Qwest modem has an added-on wireless connector. My computers in the back of the house are connected to that modem through a Linksys WRT54GS which has the default of being a LAN with a wireless access point to that LAN. Not that it matters but these are Linux OS on PC. My landlady has a Mac G5 and we purchased a Belkin version of what is basically the same thing as the WRT54GS, same functionality. She purchased it, wants it to work without a connecting cat5 cable. Yes, connecting both routers or simply the ethernet port on her Mac to the WRT54GS would be the simplest solution but she doesn't want that. (this might seem to be off the topic of THIS thread but there's another TechRepublic forum thread where the answers being given are rather pedantic insistence that connecting through cat5 hardwire would be the better solution. That would require, however, drilling holes in the walls or floor.) Thus, through reasons of Social Engineering rather than merely "the most expedient technical solution, hardwiring" the two routers HAVE to be networked over wireless. It's supposed to be easy. The advertising uses the words "easy" and "simple" quite a few times, in the case of the Qwest modem, and the Linksys and the Belkin all three. IF somebody who works at the Technical Division of any of those three entities could please answer the technical aspects of how to do it, using preferably the Setup Utilities within each of the devices, that would be a major breakthrough in communication. Adding such a how-to on their respective websites would also be a huge improvement. Asking WHY do it that way rather than a simple cat5 connection is unnecessary and really counterproductive. It lends to the stereotype that Techies tend to think of ourselves as a Priestly Order, ordained to be the Keepers of Arcane Tech Knowledge. I'm a fairly skilled Techie myself, but this problem is kicking my gluteus maximus, hard fast and repeatedly. + 0 Votes re my last post JonahElijah 3 years ago Also buying yet another wireless transceiver is kind of out of the question as well. The existing hardware is supposedly compatible one with another. + 0 Votes another 2 wireless router when they should have bought AP question CG IT Updated - 3 years ago Must be that Access Points often are almost in the same price range as routers, so those that buy 2 wireless routers think their getting more bang for the buck. A router is a router is a router regardless of wired or wireless. A router is used to break up a large network into smaller networks [creates a broadcast domain]. the wireless portion of the route simply allows hosts to connect to the router just like wired hosts do [but without the wire]. If one needs to provide wireless access in another location that has poor wireless reception, buy an Access Point. take the fraking wireless router back, and buy an access point. use the KISS method. + 0 Votes What you need to do is check for Wireless Distribution Support (WDS) Charles Bundy Updated - 2 years ago on the two routers. I googled and pretty sure neither of the devices you listed support WDS. Read more here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_distribution_system You could check DD-WRT or Tomato and see if there is a router firmware replacement for the D-Link/2Wire. I know DD-WRT supports WDS.