Tecnologico de Monterrey

Displaying 1-1 of 1 results

  • White Papers // Feb 2009

    Measurements and Comparison of WiMAX Radio Coverage at 2.5 GHz and 3.5 GHz

    The performance of co-located WiMAX transmitter sites operating at 2.5 and 3.5GHz are compared, based on coverage assessments. The study showed that the 2.5GHz performed marginally better than the 3.5GHz under the same RF conditions and clutter environments. In general, the 2.5GHz was found to provide slightly better coverage at...

    Provided By Tecnologico de Monterrey

  • White Papers // Feb 2009

    Measurements and Comparison of WiMAX Radio Coverage at 2.5 GHz and 3.5 GHz

    The performance of co-located WiMAX transmitter sites operating at 2.5 and 3.5GHz are compared, based on coverage assessments. The study showed that the 2.5GHz performed marginally better than the 3.5GHz under the same RF conditions and clutter environments. In general, the 2.5GHz was found to provide slightly better coverage at...

    Provided By Tecnologico de Monterrey