Leadership

Group Decision-Making: An Economic Analysis Of Social Influence And Individual Difference In Experimental Juries

Download Now Free registration required

Executive Summary

In a jury decision-making, individuals must compromise in order to reach a group consensus. If individuals compromise for non-rational reasons, such as a preference for conformity or due to erroneous information, then the final decision of the group may be biased. This paper presents original experimental data which shows that groups do have a significant tendency to compromise in jury-like settings. Econometric evidence also shows that features of groups, including the generosity of the group overall, will dictate the extent of compromise.

  • Format: PDF
  • Size: 562.5 KB